Started By
Message

re: What was the deal with the penalty on Loston's INT?

Posted on 11/18/12 at 9:32 am to
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127483 posts
Posted on 11/18/12 at 9:32 am to
quote:

It doesn't seem like you can just change the penalty like that


How was it changed?
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70587 posts
Posted on 11/18/12 at 9:33 am to
In the stadium, it sounded like they changed it to a dead ball foul when it clearly happened in the course of the play.

ETA: The reason I'm asking is because I didn't really get a clear understanding from inside the stadium. I was hoping someone that watched on TV could expound on it.
This post was edited on 11/18/12 at 9:35 am
Posted by ultratiger89
Houston, Tx
Member since Aug 2007
3042 posts
Posted on 11/18/12 at 9:39 am to
quote:

How was it changed?

live ball foul to dead ball foul.

it seemed odd to me because the penalty was during what was perceived to be a live ball, but the play was determined to have been over when his knee hit the ground, thus, anything that happened after that determination should be null and void. if the run back was negated so should have the penalty been negated.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram