- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/18/12 at 2:01 pm to Lester Earl
The I we thing is for someone covering the team to report. Consider play-by-play.
To me, there's a place for color analyst, so to speak.
Style / formalism is necessary, and there are various choices for each, appropriate choices for a range of situations.
To dismiss the content on the basis of style is a choice by the reader and a risk the writer takes.
I tend to try to take the good and leave thr bad, myself.
Personally, I take chances and accept the risk people won't like them. I am unapologetically a.fan, and that sets my scope. In style, I think I'm less of a "we" guy, but I take other chances.
I predicted 20 wins for the season, by the way. I'm not sure a stray "we" makes me a homer.
To me, there's a place for color analyst, so to speak.
Style / formalism is necessary, and there are various choices for each, appropriate choices for a range of situations.
To dismiss the content on the basis of style is a choice by the reader and a risk the writer takes.
I tend to try to take the good and leave thr bad, myself.
Personally, I take chances and accept the risk people won't like them. I am unapologetically a.fan, and that sets my scope. In style, I think I'm less of a "we" guy, but I take other chances.
I predicted 20 wins for the season, by the way. I'm not sure a stray "we" makes me a homer.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News