Started By
Message

re: SEC scheduling question

Posted on 11/7/12 at 10:35 pm to
Posted by Lacour
Member since Nov 2009
32949 posts
Posted on 11/7/12 at 10:35 pm to
I don't understand why Oklahoma and Nebraska were able to stop meeting every year after nearly 100 consecutive meetings when the Big 12 formed back in the mid 90s but Tennessee and Bama can't.

No wonder the southern states are the poorest, dumbest, and fattest.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 11/8/12 at 7:00 am to
quote:

No wonder the southern states are the poorest, dumbest, and fattest



smartest post ever from apparently the richest, smartest, and thinnest poster ever
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29233 posts
Posted on 11/9/12 at 6:52 am to
quote:

I don't understand why Oklahoma and Nebraska were able to stop meeting every year after nearly 100 consecutive meetings when the Big 12 formed back in the mid 90s but Tennessee and Bama can't.


This! I grew up following SEC football and never knew that Alabama and UTe were bitter rivals until Alabama started whining about it during interdivisional scheduling. No one cares about preserving this so-called rivalries outside the Gump Nation and Slive and their other lackies in Birmingham. Has anyone asked UTe if they want to be saddled with $abin every year, or would prefer a chance to play Ole Miss occasionally? It's a complete travesty-as if having their own officials every game isn't advantage enough.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram