Started By
Message

re: Was Stanford hosed?

Posted on 10/13/12 at 8:00 pm to
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12312 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

um, he wouldnt have ran in unless someone blew a whistle chief.


You can watch it if you want. He was running in with the whistle still hanging down and didn't raise his hands. I watched for that specifically since I knew you wouldn't be able to hear the whistle on the replay. It's something that isn't really debatable.
This post was edited on 10/13/12 at 8:01 pm
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33956 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 8:30 pm to
the problem is the ref just didn't explain it...he didn't say what they were reviewing and didn't say why they ruled what they did

at least explain something that important
Posted by GoIrish02
Member since Mar 2012
1390 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 8:45 pm to
1. The whistle blew

2. Taylor's elbow hit the ground short of the goal line, as indicated by photo evidence:





3. Taylor lost control of the ball as he tried to stretch it over the goal line.

4. A Stanford O-lineman recovered the ball, but in college as in the pros, a ball fumbled on 4th down cannot be advanced, so the ball returns to the spot of the fumble. Game over.

5. Evidence to overturn the call on the field must be irrefutable, which hardly occurred here.

Mark May, the haters and the Stanford whiners call all suck it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram