Started By
Message

re: Was Stanford hosed?

Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:18 pm to
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21557 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:18 pm to
quote:


It should have been called, but it wasn't. That's the point.



Also, the video evidence needs to be INCONCLUSIVE. He did lose possession.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71799 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

He did lose possession.


After the ball had clearly crossed the goalline.
Posted by Alley
Smashville
Member since Sep 2005
3235 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:20 pm to
Looked like he lost possession after touching the goal line. Stanford recovered as well.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

He did lose possession.


You do know that the second the slightest part of the ball crosses the goal line it's a TD right? The ball was clearly across the goal line with possession. Doesn't really matter though since Stanford recovered the "fumble."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram