Started By
Message

re: Will Halo 4 be more like Reach or Halo 2&3?

Posted on 10/18/12 at 5:38 pm to
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
58110 posts
Posted on 10/18/12 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Reach really wasn't that bad.
This. But I guess when it comes right after Halo 3, the insanely high standards for Halo can make a well-made game look mediocre. I have just recently gotten addicted to Reach Multiplayer. Team Swat only. Armor abilities was the stupidest idea since Duke Nuke'em.

ETA: Also, the need to bring back the ranking system of Halo 2/old Halo 3. Enough of this "If you play enough everyone can be the same rank" bullshite. Bring back the numbers. If you're good, you get a high rank. If you're garbage, you are a garbage rank. Easy as that.
This post was edited on 10/18/12 at 5:39 pm
Posted by happyhappyjoyjoy
Packer/Suns fan too
Member since Apr 2011
2947 posts
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

This. But I guess when it comes right after Halo 3, the insanely high standards for Halo can make a well-made game look mediocre. I have just recently gotten addicted to Reach Multiplayer. Team Swat only. Armor abilities was the stupidest idea since Duke Nuke'em.


I've gotten addicted to Reach again too. I think a lot of the reason I disliked Reach when it came out was getting through Warrant Officer felt like a huge grind and took a lot of fun out. Now that I'm passed that it seems like I'm enjoying it more and more. Big Team Battles FTW.
Posted by sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
15021 posts
Posted on 10/19/12 at 12:41 am to
quote:

Armor abilities was the stupidest idea since Duke Nuke'em.


Armor lock made me quit Halo
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram