re: So we face a very weak Secondary...and I am honestly almost certain we won't...

quote:

---

Wait...You're telling me that running PA and having it be CREDIBLE PA and using the middle of the field won't give us more time in the pocket? That running middle routes somehow take more time on a read than a deep out? That by slowing down the USC defense, we will somehow have less time to give routes to develop?

That by requiring them to cover the slot receiver (Landry) one-on-one that we will still have problems in the passing game?

Landry in space versus a nickel defender or linebacker is a win for us every time. The problem has been that he's had bracketed coverage and we run (at BEST) two receiver pass-plays that give the advantage back to the defense even on PA passing.

---

I don't disagree with this. PA is only going to work if we can run the ball. Apparently we cannot anymore.

If we get Landry 1 on 1 against a LB or S, that would be great. Attacking the middle of the field would be a welcome change. I'm hoping we've found something with Jacobs over the middle.

You're seeing too much potential in our passing attack. There are problems at every level.

I hope we light SC's secondary up.