Started By
Message

re: Is "walking away" from a mortgage wrong?

Posted on 10/11/12 at 11:38 am to
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8179 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 11:38 am to
It makes no difference to you, but one post above you call that theft. Just because you don't like your condo, I would consider it theft to stop paying a third party when you have the ability to do so.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423382 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 11:47 am to
quote:

I would consider it theft to stop paying a third party when you have the ability to do so.

why?

it's a business decision. the contract doesn't state that you will get extra penalties if you could pay it and choose not to

the contract says they will loan you x principal at y rate and you'll pay z/month back over a certain period of time. if you fail to pay z, they'll seize the house (assuming non-recourse states).

the person walking away will suffer consequences as a result. the secondary effects will be a huge ding to your credit that will take a long time to recover from. second, they will have lost on what they had already paid in terms of downpayment

ability to pay doesn't matter. the question is whether the costs from leaving (described above) are less than teh costs from staying and paying timely. if the costs from leaving are lower, then you leave.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram