- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU offense - 2011 - 870 Total Plays 591 runs, 279 passes. Run 68% of offense.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:53 am
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:53 am
70-30% sounds like a good game plan to me with LSU's running talent. With Mett it could go to 60/40 run which is what Bama and other SEC teams used last year.
LINK
LINK
5
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:55 am to LSU1NSEC
What about 50/50?
70/30 run/pass makes you one dimensional
70/30 run/pass makes you one dimensional
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:57 am to LSU1NSEC
42/58?
This post was edited on 9/6/12 at 11:58 am
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:02 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Posted by TheDoc
What about 50/50?
70/30 run/pass makes you one dimensional
Couldn't agree more
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:06 pm to Child of the Missip
I like to see LSU run and wear the opponent defense down. Seems to pay dividends late in the game.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:13 pm to LSU1NSEC
I'd like to see the breakdown of Run vs. Pass when the score was within 14 points.
Running the ball 30 times in the 2nd half up by 28 points every game would be just fine with me.
Running the ball 30 times in the 2nd half up by 28 points every game would be just fine with me.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:14 pm to TheDoc
I think that people get too caught up in the percentages. If this teams passes because it wants to in lieu of passing because it has to, it will be just fine......
I feel that was the biggest issue last year.....we only passed when we had to....
I feel that was the biggest issue last year.....we only passed when we had to....
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:15 pm to TheDoc
quote:
70/30 run/pass makes you one dimensional
"I love being one-dimensional."
- Tommie Frazier, 1995
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:15 pm to LSU1NSEC
2012 offense
50% run
50% bubble screens
50% run
50% bubble screens
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:18 pm to Maximus
quote:
50% run
50% bubble screens
Fine by me. That is pretty much exactly what our offense was in 2003, and shitty Mauck threw for 2800 yards and 28 TDs. If that happens for Mett, we win it all.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:19 pm to TheDoc
quote:
What about 50/50?
Since when was there ever an offense in college football that was "50-50"?
57-43 seems more realistic.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:13 pm to Tiger in NY
quote:
Fine by me. That is pretty much exactly what our offense was in 2003, and shitty Mauck threw for 2800 yards and 28 TDs
not quite
We threw deep to Devery Henderson and I don't think we ever ran Michael Clayton bubble screens or line passes.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:16 pm to TheDoc
quote:
70/30 run/pass makes you one dimensional
seems like 2 dimentions to me
100/0 would be 1 dimentional
why take something you do extremely well, and reduce it just for the sake of percentages... ?
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:18 pm to Maximus
quote:
I don't think we ever ran Michael Clayton bubble screens or line passes
we threw slip screens to Clayton, he was the blocker on many a bubble tho.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:23 pm to ATLTiger
quote:
he was the blocker on many a bubble tho.
yeah in 2001 for Reed
I guess we threw some to Skyler in 03 but i dont really remember it.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:32 pm to Maximus
Wasn't skylers td against Oklahoma on a bubble?
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:32 pm to TheDoc
quote:
What about 50/50?
oh why did your parents let you out of your cage this morning
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:48 pm to TheDoc
50/50 play calling is fricking stupid. I would almost guarantee that the closer a team gets to that, the worse they are.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 2:08 pm to LSU1NSEC
As long as the opponent cannot stop our run, why risk Mett's health and turnovers passing? With the default assumption being that Mett and our receivers form a capable passing game.
Jam it down their Fking throats if it's working.
I love seeing a dominant rushing attack.
But last year, when it wasn't working too good, like against Bama (rematch) and Georgia, I would have preferred to have a viable passing attack, which unfortunately did not exist with #9 under center.
And opposing DC's knew this hence their stacking of the box and completely shutting down the LSU offense.
Jam it down their Fking throats if it's working.
I love seeing a dominant rushing attack.
But last year, when it wasn't working too good, like against Bama (rematch) and Georgia, I would have preferred to have a viable passing attack, which unfortunately did not exist with #9 under center.
And opposing DC's knew this hence their stacking of the box and completely shutting down the LSU offense.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 2:12 pm to Hot Carl
It's not stupid if you're just as good throwing it as you are running it or vice versa. There are many programs each year that can throw and run the ball equally effectively. Those offensive teams are always the toughest to defend.
There are many an LSU offensive team over the years that would be
50/50 in play calling each week and it was to the detriment of the offense's success because the Head Coach was fixated on being a 50/50 team instead of playing to the offense's strengths to score more points.
There are many an LSU offensive team over the years that would be
50/50 in play calling each week and it was to the detriment of the offense's success because the Head Coach was fixated on being a 50/50 team instead of playing to the offense's strengths to score more points.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News