- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trade Collusion?
Posted on 9/6/12 at 3:04 am to Bearded Angler
Posted on 9/6/12 at 3:04 am to Bearded Angler
Collusion is a pretty hefty accusation. It's something you may want to think twice about before quickly throwing that out there as commissioner. I'm not sure how long you've been running a league and I'm not telling you how to, but you should be pretty sure about that type of thing.
To answer your OP, no I don't think it is. Bad trade for team A? Absolutely. Getting Calvin is always a great thing, but at what cost? For team A, he's leaving himself relying on Helu, Bush, and a now injury riddled Lynch. His WRs are already pretty good, so I don't get why he'd do it.
To answer your OP, no I don't think it is. Bad trade for team A? Absolutely. Getting Calvin is always a great thing, but at what cost? For team A, he's leaving himself relying on Helu, Bush, and a now injury riddled Lynch. His WRs are already pretty good, so I don't get why he'd do it.
1
Posted on 9/6/12 at 8:15 am to DCBJR6
I wouldn't be necessarily say its collusion but it's a very unfair trade. I think espn defines reason for a veto as collusion or if the commissioner thinks the trade is lop sided or unfair, which it is
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News