Started By
Message

re: CFN: LSU vs Alabama Roundtable

Posted on 7/27/12 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by wilceaux
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2004
12421 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Because it is true.


No, it's not. Bama wasn't given the benefit of the doubt. They had a slightly better (or at least similar) resume. The human voters therefore had to decide who they thought was the better team, and they thought that was Bama. I would say they were right.
Posted by L S Usetheforce
Member since Jun 2004
22806 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 12:46 pm to
They didnt have a similar resume.....osu had best like 5 top 25 teams......all they harped on was which loss was worse.....

That was the big deal.....OSU was conference champs, better schedule on paper but "how and who they loss too" was a big factor.


Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46649 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

No, it's not. Bama wasn't given the benefit of the doubt. They had a slightly better (or at least similar) resume. The human voters therefore had to decide who they thought was the better team, and they thought that was Bama. I would say they were right.


Uh no. OSU's resume killed Bama's resume. There is a reason Espn wouldn't show the two teams's resumes until after the bcs show.
Pre bowl season , Bama beat 2 ranked teams. OSU BEAT 5 ranked teams. Hell Bama only beat 3 teams with a winning record.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram