Sound suppressors eh? I'm sure you were being funny but they have earplugs and muffs for that. But I agree we should be allowed silencers. What business of the government is that? And while I don't the automatic weapons are necessary and are not effective in a militia situation, why can't we have them? Where is this invisible line? I want a fricking flame thrower. In a short blast it painfully kills attackers with minimal property damage. The government gets 40% of money to pay for the others. I pay that price for the liberties afforded by our Constitution. They can eat a dick with the particulars.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hugo Stiglitz

Member since Oct 2010

72937 posts

Posted on 7/21/12 at 4:38 pm to pooponsaban

quote:
I'm sure you were being funny but they have earplugs and muffs for that.

Did you even read my post

Additionally, the earplugs and muffs can only help so much. Suppressors can reduce the decibel level far below the protection level earplugs offer.

quote:
What business of the government is that?

I don't have a problem with them knowing I have a suppressor. They already know I have guns.

quote:
And while I don't the automatic weapons are necessary and are not effective in a militia situation, why can't we have them?

Huh?

You can have them.

quote:
Where is this invisible line?

Well, I don't think civilians should be allowed to have militarized tanks or jets for obvious reasons.

quote:
I want a fricking flame thrower. In a short blast it painfully kills attackers with minimal property damage.

trolling I hope, I don't know the law on flame throwers but they are extremely dangerous to the operator.

quote:
The government gets 40% of money to pay for the others. I pay that price for the liberties afforded by our Constitution. They can eat a dick with the particulars.

okay

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by ninthward