Started By
Message

re: Rematches in the playoffs: Should they be forced to play in 1st round?

Posted on 6/27/12 at 7:59 pm to
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59492 posts
Posted on 6/27/12 at 7:59 pm to
While I think rematches would suck, what would suck worse is making an undefeated #1 seed have to play a #2 or #3 just to avoid a rematch with a #4 they've already beaten. Especially if #4 has 2 losses and the team #1 winds up playing is undefeated. A rematch would suck, but there has to be an advantage to being the #1 seed. And that should be to play the most seemingly inferior of the 4 teams. Even if you've already played them.


It's kind of how I felt about the BCSNG this year. As an LSU fan, I think it totally sucked cock to have to play an Alabama team we'd already beaten on the road. As a CFB fan, I think it would have probably sucked worse overall to put in an Oklahoma State team who lost to Iowa State and who appeared to clearly be inferior to Bama, just to avoid a rematch.
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37383 posts
Posted on 6/27/12 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

It's kind of how I felt about the BCSNG this year. As an LSU fan, I think it totally sucked cock to have to play an Alabama team we'd already beaten on the road. As a CFB fan, I think it would have probably sucked worse overall to put in an Oklahoma State team who lost to Iowa State and who appeared to clearly be inferior to Bama, just to avoid a rematch.


I haven't followed this much over the past 2 days. Will there still be conference championship games?

If so, this format could mean 2 teams could play each other 3 times in one season (regular season, conference championship game, and 4 team playoff game).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram