- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The reason why LSU assistant coaching changes seem like an act of Congress
Posted on 6/14/12 at 8:54 pm to Catman88
Posted on 6/14/12 at 8:54 pm to Catman88
Thank you for the lovely comments. Anyways someone asked for proof. On page 1 of the LSU employment application they ask for your SS# and your birth date. Page 3 asks for your race. All three are required information. Why does LSU need that for an initial application for employment? Now for the proof on the software that screens out qualified candidates. I have put in a hyperlink below showing you the proof. 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence unless you want to read the entire article. Enjoy the CWS my friends. Good night!
LINK
LINK
Posted on 6/15/12 at 7:40 am to CPM's son
Do you know it costs money for a company to pull a credit bureau? You really think LSU pulls a bureau for every tom dick and harry that applies for a job at LSU? OR (ok you might have to use your one brain cell for this?) Just maybe... They request the info so that incase you are chosen for the job they can do a background check.
quote:
Now for the proof on the software that screens out qualified candidates. I have put in a hyperlink below showing you the proof. 3rd paragraph 1st sentence
Im guessing you meant 5th paragraph??
I dont see where it states that the software violates EEOC and FCRA. OR that LSU has software that does so.
Here is my proof:
From the FCRA § 616. Civil liability for willful noncompliance [15 U.S.C. § 1681n]
"(b) Civil liability for knowing noncompliance. Any person who obtains a consumer report from a consumer reporting agency under false pretenses or knowingly without a permissible purpose shall be liable to the consumer reporting agency for actual damages sustained by the consumer reporting agency or $1,000, whichever is greater."
•Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §621
•Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000e
This post was edited on 6/15/12 at 7:45 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News