- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: **OFFICIAL** Pelicans Thread
Posted on 12/4/12 at 9:55 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 12/4/12 at 9:55 pm to Lester Earl
The guy had no clue who bought them.
What actually happened was two people on separate occasions said these were the top two names. Nothing was printed. These LLC's popped up. The story was printed with disclosures about why the connection was reasonable without disclosing the two people's identities.
This was around the time when Mrs. Gayle was also talking about Cardinal Red.
The reporting was just fine. It disclosed the publicly available facts and left it for people to evaluate the information on their own.
Again, you fail to acknowledge the good work done alongside the work you value less (which is your perogative, of course) or that your original claim here of taking credit for the story was unfounded since national media sources were doing that first.
The story is reprinted (sans historical stuff) above for people to read on their own without clicking over.
What actually happened was two people on separate occasions said these were the top two names. Nothing was printed. These LLC's popped up. The story was printed with disclosures about why the connection was reasonable without disclosing the two people's identities.
This was around the time when Mrs. Gayle was also talking about Cardinal Red.
The reporting was just fine. It disclosed the publicly available facts and left it for people to evaluate the information on their own.
Again, you fail to acknowledge the good work done alongside the work you value less (which is your perogative, of course) or that your original claim here of taking credit for the story was unfounded since national media sources were doing that first.
The story is reprinted (sans historical stuff) above for people to read on their own without clicking over.
1
Posted on 12/4/12 at 10:02 pm to 42
What work do you want me to acknowledge as good?
The Pelicans was always the likely choice , anyone with some common sense knew that.
I am not trying to take credit for the story. I'm just telling what I said then about the article and how it shouldn't have been assumed Benson bought those names.
it was stupid to run with the angels & demons names and pass them off as the 2 choices.
But of course is expected the huge ego like all the other douches on the site. Can't admit to being wrong, just want all the credit for being "right"
The Pelicans was always the likely choice , anyone with some common sense knew that.
I am not trying to take credit for the story. I'm just telling what I said then about the article and how it shouldn't have been assumed Benson bought those names.
it was stupid to run with the angels & demons names and pass them off as the 2 choices.
But of course is expected the huge ego like all the other douches on the site. Can't admit to being wrong, just want all the credit for being "right"
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News