- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: **OFFICIAL** Pelicans Thread
Posted on 12/4/12 at 9:48 pm to groundpatty
Posted on 12/4/12 at 9:48 pm to groundpatty
The names ended up being for a Tshirt company I just read tonight. How is that not bad reporting?
As I said then, they had no clue who bought the names.
As I said then, they had no clue who bought the names.
2
Posted on 12/4/12 at 9:50 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
The names ended up being for a Tshirt company I just read tonight. How is that not bad reporting?
As I said then, they had no clue who bought the names.
Honest question. Why do you give a rat's arse about this silly crap?
Posted on 12/4/12 at 9:55 pm to Lester Earl
The guy had no clue who bought them.
What actually happened was two people on separate occasions said these were the top two names. Nothing was printed. These LLC's popped up. The story was printed with disclosures about why the connection was reasonable without disclosing the two people's identities.
This was around the time when Mrs. Gayle was also talking about Cardinal Red.
The reporting was just fine. It disclosed the publicly available facts and left it for people to evaluate the information on their own.
Again, you fail to acknowledge the good work done alongside the work you value less (which is your perogative, of course) or that your original claim here of taking credit for the story was unfounded since national media sources were doing that first.
The story is reprinted (sans historical stuff) above for people to read on their own without clicking over.
What actually happened was two people on separate occasions said these were the top two names. Nothing was printed. These LLC's popped up. The story was printed with disclosures about why the connection was reasonable without disclosing the two people's identities.
This was around the time when Mrs. Gayle was also talking about Cardinal Red.
The reporting was just fine. It disclosed the publicly available facts and left it for people to evaluate the information on their own.
Again, you fail to acknowledge the good work done alongside the work you value less (which is your perogative, of course) or that your original claim here of taking credit for the story was unfounded since national media sources were doing that first.
The story is reprinted (sans historical stuff) above for people to read on their own without clicking over.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News