- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Stevan Ridley or Jamaal Charles?
Posted on 4/26/12 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 4/26/12 at 1:11 pm
Truly torn here. I'm in an auction keeper league with a $200 budget. I picked up Charles mid season with plans to keep him, and I have Ridley on my roster as well.
I can keep Charles for $7 or Ridley for $2. I'm torn on who is going to have the better future.
Charles was great for a season then got last season wrecked. Now he's coming off a major injury with a workhouse back (Peyton Hillis) to share the load.
Ridley has always had the potential but is unproven. He put up crazy numbers in preseason and the last few games of the season, and with BJGE gone he is the only true running back they have and is primed for the future.
Thoughts on this? I am leaning toward Ridley currently.
I can keep Charles for $7 or Ridley for $2. I'm torn on who is going to have the better future.
Charles was great for a season then got last season wrecked. Now he's coming off a major injury with a workhouse back (Peyton Hillis) to share the load.
Ridley has always had the potential but is unproven. He put up crazy numbers in preseason and the last few games of the season, and with BJGE gone he is the only true running back they have and is primed for the future.
Thoughts on this? I am leaning toward Ridley currently.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 1:16 pm to Thundercles
Charles. He had no issues having a big season when he and Jones were splitting carries. Hillis shouldn't hurt his value... especially for 7 whooping dollars.
Ridley plays for Bilicheck that plays a large rotation(Vereen/Woodhead/etc.) and in a heavy passing attack.
Ridley plays for Bilicheck that plays a large rotation(Vereen/Woodhead/etc.) and in a heavy passing attack.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 1:22 pm to Thundercles
quote:
he is the only true running back they have and is primed for the future.
Naw
Posted on 4/26/12 at 1:33 pm to Thundercles
There was a veteran back the Pats brought in last week who they had high interest in. It's slipping me who exactly It was. But it was someone that would've started over Ridley
ETA: it was tim hightower
they also worked out Ryan Grant
ETA: it was tim hightower
they also worked out Ryan Grant
This post was edited on 4/26/12 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 4/26/12 at 1:48 pm to Lester Earl
Shane Vareen too
Pats will never have a true #1 back
Charles is a top 5 RB. It's a no brainer
Pats will never have a true #1 back
Charles is a top 5 RB. It's a no brainer
Posted on 4/26/12 at 4:13 pm to Thundercles
quote:
Stevan Ridley or Jamaal Charles?
Easy choice. Charles is a stud when healthy.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 4:51 pm to BhamTigah
this should not even be close......not for $5 difference.
Posted on 4/27/12 at 3:15 am to Sid in Lakeshore
This is probably why I have never won my league
Posted on 4/29/12 at 10:17 am to Thundercles
Charles.
He has top end potential if he is healthy and has shown he can put up that production while sharing the carries.
Ridley
Patriots tend to split the work up and his value may be highly TD dependent.
For a $5 difference Charles is the best value.
He has top end potential if he is healthy and has shown he can put up that production while sharing the carries.
Ridley
Patriots tend to split the work up and his value may be highly TD dependent.
For a $5 difference Charles is the best value.
Popular
Back to top
4







