- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why the 2nd round pick in 2013?
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:07 pm
Not that I'm complaining but I was curious as to why they took our 2nd round pick for 2013 and not the 1st round pick. I know we don't have a 1st round pick this year but I don't remember losing one for 2013 via trade or anything.
3
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:09 pm to YMCA
Shhh they might hear you
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:10 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Because they felt taking our first born was more fitting.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:10 pm to YMCA
Godell to Loomis...."two dat you bitches".
Thats why.
Thats why.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:13 pm to YMCA
quote:
Not that I'm complaining but I was curious as to why they took our 2nd round pick for 2013 and not the 1st round pick. I know we don't have a 1st round pick this year but I don't remember losing one for 2013 via trade or anything.
Taking any 2013 picks was egregious.
It punishes people not responsible for the bounty infractions, namely the fans.
frick you Goodell.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:21 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Taking any 2013 picks was egregious
I agree 100%. As a matter of fact I feel that with us trading away a 1st rounder for this year and not getting much out of Ingram that he would look at that as being punished enough.
He just wants to look like a hard arse and he picked the saints as a way of doing it.
Him!
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:25 pm to YMCA
quote:
I agree 100%. As a matter of fact I feel that with us trading away a 1st rounder for this year and not getting much out of Ingram that he would look at that as being punished enough
122 ATT
474 YDS
5 TD
We'll see how he does now that his rookie season is out of the way, which was arguably the best of all rookie runningbacks last year.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 12:30 pm to Pendulum
quote:
122 ATT 474 YDS 5 TD
My bad if you thought I meant he didn't help out. I was saying we gave up a 1st rounder and didn't get a full year out of the guy. I truly feel he will be a major part of the team if healthy for an entire season.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 1:03 pm to YMCA
I think if we had not used our 1st round last year, we would have lost it this year. Perhaps 2, two's equals the one he couldn't take away.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 1:06 pm to CarrolltonTiger
quote:
I think if we had not used our 1st round last year, we would have lost it this year.
This is all but certain.
No matter what Ingram does now, it wasn't a wasted pick.
This post was edited on 3/30/12 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 3/30/12 at 1:15 pm to Pendulum
quote:
which was arguably the best of all rookie runningbacks last year
Demarco Murray says hello!
Posted on 3/30/12 at 1:18 pm to YMCA
Because that leaves us with only a 3rd round pick this season, decreasing the chances of getting a player who can make an immediate impact.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 1:25 pm to LaBornNRaised
164 Att
897 Yds
2 TDs
Why I said it is arguable, 3.9 to 5.4 ypc while 5 td's to 2 Tds. Murray had more of a passing game role aswell. It comes down to what stats you value the most. Both got injured. Demarco had much less company in the stable.
897 Yds
2 TDs
Why I said it is arguable, 3.9 to 5.4 ypc while 5 td's to 2 Tds. Murray had more of a passing game role aswell. It comes down to what stats you value the most. Both got injured. Demarco had much less company in the stable.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 3:13 pm to CarrolltonTiger
quote:
I think if we had not used our 1st round last year, we would have lost it this year. Perhaps 2, two's equals the one he couldn't take away.
This. When they announced the penalty, the talking heads were all saying the NFL wanted to take a draft pick away from us this year. But we didn't have a first round pick this year. So they went second rounder this year & second rounder next year, so that they could at least take something this year. They also were saying that taking a second rounder this year and a first rounder from us next year was thought to be too punitive.
Of course, I'm happy they thought some punishments were thought to be too punitive. It's really nice how they decided to cut us a break and give us an "easy" punishment.
He's so popular now, Roger Goodell can no longer retire in Louisiana . . .
Posted on 3/30/12 at 4:57 pm to TigerHoo
"why?? Cuz frick em. That's why!!" - goodell
Posted on 3/30/12 at 5:16 pm to LSU Rules07
My guess the reason for 2 twos, is because we dont have a one forfeit this year.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News