Started By
Message

re: MUST a landowner lease land to secure royalties...

Posted on 3/3/12 at 9:30 pm to
Posted by JWS3
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
2502 posts
Posted on 3/3/12 at 9:30 pm to
No, he can remained unleased and will be entitled to 100% of the royaltys for his 2 acres after the cost of the well is paid out of production. 28 months is just an arbitrary number it could be months or years there is no set time period, it depends on how the rate of production of the well and the market price for the oil or gas. He is also probably passing up bonus money that would be paid for just signing the lease, the increased royaly money would make up for this, but the bonus money is guaranteed while future royaltys carry risk. The well may not produce as expected, the life of the well may be cut short by formation problems, or based on the production of wells that are already drilled in the area, they decide not to drill his section. The latter has happened to me twice, so am glad I took the bonus money and leased.
This post was edited on 3/3/12 at 9:32 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98374 posts
Posted on 3/3/12 at 9:59 pm to
If oil and gas accounting is like Hollywood accounting, where a movie makes $500 million and loses money, he's better off getting as much as he can up front.
Posted by gonads&strife
Member since Dec 2011
1885 posts
Posted on 3/3/12 at 11:33 pm to
Actually the operator is entitled to recover drilling costs X2.

To the OP, your dad should lease. The well might not pay out twice so he won't get anything or it could take a long time and by the time he gets in pay status prod may have significantly declined. So while he's getting 8/8ths he would have made more over time by leasing for a 1/4 plus a bonus payment.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram