- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why no new Star Trek tv series?
Posted on 2/23/12 at 9:40 pm to Thundercles
Posted on 2/23/12 at 9:40 pm to Thundercles
quote:
Bryan Singer proposed one, but it was a fricking awful premise. They were going to have it set far in the future, with the Federation trapped in a time of stagnation. Basically in his vision the Federation would have spent two centuries not doing shite and losing power fast. No one would have wanted to watch that.
I think Rodenberry had a similar idea for a Star Trek sequel set in the Federation's far future. It morphed into Andromeda.
1
Posted on 2/23/12 at 9:47 pm to Master of Sinanju
I enjoyed Enterprise. It's actually my favorite series after DS9. Just something about the initial voyages into the final frontier. Kind of had a Columbus thing going on.
The temporal storyline was a little much, but the series had a lot of good stories, as they could do a lot with species interacting with Humans for the first time and not understanding what we are like, then learning about us, as well as us learning about them.
Wish that series got eight years instead of Voyager.
The temporal storyline was a little much, but the series had a lot of good stories, as they could do a lot with species interacting with Humans for the first time and not understanding what we are like, then learning about us, as well as us learning about them.
Wish that series got eight years instead of Voyager.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News