- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why no new Star Trek tv series?
Posted on 2/23/12 at 8:45 pm to Thundercles
Posted on 2/23/12 at 8:45 pm to Thundercles
quote:
They were going to have it set far in the future, with the Federation trapped in a time of stagnation. Basically in his vision the Federation would have spent two centuries not doing shite and losing power fast.
That actually sounds good to me. Like the Roman Empire struggling not ot fall. Make it dark but still hopeful.
1
Posted on 2/23/12 at 9:04 pm to Cold Pizza
Interesting you say this
I just don't think people would react to humans/The Federation being "weaker" in the presence of others. Unless the show were about some kind of upheaval and a return to power over the course of the series, but they didn't detail this in what I read.
quote:
Burnett explains that they wanted to create an allegory both to the decline of the Roman Empire as well as to the 21st century "American Empire" which had started showing strains
I just don't think people would react to humans/The Federation being "weaker" in the presence of others. Unless the show were about some kind of upheaval and a return to power over the course of the series, but they didn't detail this in what I read.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News