Started By
Message

re: who thinks if Mett would have started most of 2011, we would have won em all?

Posted on 1/27/12 at 8:19 pm to
Posted by RighteousTiger
Member since Nov 2009
692 posts
Posted on 1/27/12 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

Im pretty sure we could have started rivers and won every game last year besides Alabama


Really? The main reason we won the first game was because of JJ's option and feet, but the main reason we lost the second one was because of the same reason and that we didn't even attempt to throw the ball down field.
This post was edited on 1/27/12 at 8:21 pm
Posted by sdc74
Houston
Member since Jan 2007
1195 posts
Posted on 1/27/12 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Really? The main reason we won the first game was because of JJ's option and feet, but the main reason we lost the second one was because of the same reason and that we didn't even attempt to throw the ball down field.


Smart man!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261685 posts
Posted on 1/27/12 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Really? The main reason we won the first game was because of JJ's option and feet,


The offense literally was responsible for the field position that led to 3 points in that game.

My guess, Mettenberger could have let LSU to a TD in regulation the first Alabama game, and could have at least allowed the LSU offense to be competitive in the second.
This post was edited on 1/27/12 at 9:37 pm
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 1/28/12 at 10:28 am to
quote:

we lost the second one was because of the same reason and that we didn't even attempt to throw the ball down field.



bullshite


plays were called to throw the ball down the field, the QB couldn't or wouldn't throw the ball so get your facts right please
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram