- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: who thinks if Mett would have started most of 2011, we would have won em all?
Posted on 1/27/12 at 8:16 pm to RighteousTiger
Posted on 1/27/12 at 8:16 pm to RighteousTiger
Im pretty sure we could have started rivers and won every game last year besides Alabama
3
Posted on 1/27/12 at 8:19 pm to TigerMan327
quote:
Im pretty sure we could have started rivers and won every game last year besides Alabama
Really? The main reason we won the first game was because of JJ's option and feet, but the main reason we lost the second one was because of the same reason and that we didn't even attempt to throw the ball down field.
This post was edited on 1/27/12 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 1/27/12 at 8:25 pm to TigerMan327
quote:
Im pretty sure we could have started rivers and won every game last year besides Alabama
Im sick of hearing people think that Bama was that much better than us. I don't buy it. I believe if we would have played the appropriate players and had a somewhat descent game plan, then the NC game would have went either way. Adding, that a descent game plan would have somehow involved a Mett passing attack.
Posted on 1/28/12 at 2:28 am to TigerMan327
quote:
Im pretty sure we could have started rivers and won every game last year besides Alabama
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News