- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: QB's under Les Miles...by the numbers
Posted on 1/25/12 at 7:44 pm to MFn GIMP
Posted on 1/25/12 at 7:44 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
completion %
Most people will consider that a QB should have a better completion percentage after having a full year as a starter. You definitely can not consider it progessing when the completion percentage goes down, even if only by 1%. All i'm saying, is that the majority of players increase efficiency after their first year. Fields didn't. So he regressed slightly. Less TD's, more INT's on fewer passes, that is regressing.
1
Posted on 1/25/12 at 8:27 pm to Run DMC
The completion % shouldn't matter based on one year from the next. Look at the nfl where qbs play multiple years. Their stats vary from year to year, doesn't mean they regressed. If drew brees doesn't have as good stats next year doesn't mean he regressed, now if its a trend over the next few seasons you could say he has regressed due to his age.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News