You are stupid even by gump standards.

bama is the only team to be allowed to avenge a loss to a division rival in the bcs game. The voting methodology was changed for Bama. The Game of the Century which bama lost at home was rendered meaningless for Bama. The sec championship was rendered meaningless just for Bama. The Big12 champ was locked out just for Bama. And the bcs ratings took a hit bc of Bama. It was bad college football. Yet it was all done for your team.

Your team got a handout, and youre too stupid to understand why the fans of other teams might be a bit resentful.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by PatriotAlum

Birmingham, AL

Member since Jan 2007

59 posts

Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:07 am to biglego

quote:
You are stupid even by gump standards.

bama is the only team to be allowed to avenge a loss to a division rival in the bcs game. The voting methodology was changed for Bama. The Game of the Century which bama lost at home was rendered meaningless for Bama. The sec championship was rendered meaningless just for Bama. The Big12 champ was locked out just for Bama. And the bcs ratings took a hit bc of Bama. It was bad college football. Yet it was all done for your team.

Your team got a handout, and youre too stupid to understand why the fans of other teams might be a bit resentful.

I don't think much of secfan123's posts but before you claim someone is stupid, make sure your own posts aren't full of BS. Specifically, NO methodology was changed to put Bama and LSU into a rematch.

Conference championships and conference affiliation have NEVER been part of the BCS championship game. The BCS title game has ALWAYS been to pit the best two teams against regardless of conference standings - and they got it right. Bama and LSU were the two best teams in the nation. I've read the rules several times. The rules were clearly written to allow two teams from the same conference to play. There is an entire section about how a 3rd team from the same conference can get a BCS bowl bid if it is the conference champion and if the two teams in the NC game are from the same conference. Clearly, that means they planned for the possibility of a TWO teams playing from the SAME conference when NEITHER won their conference.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by secfan123

beverly hills

Member since Jan 2010

9646 posts

Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:08 am to biglego

quote:
bama is the only team to be allowed to avenge a loss to a division rival in the bcs game. The voting methodology was changed for Bama.

No it wasnt. In fact, the formula was followed exactly as the bcs intended it to be. The top two teams made it in.

quote:
The Game of the Century which bama lost at home was rendered meaningless for Bama.

Well, ole Les luck had to run out sometime. Just think, we make one of those kicks in regulation and just maybe yall wouldnt be so shocked to learn that you got lucky in that game.

quote:
The sec championship was rendered meaningless just for Bama. The Big12 champ was locked out just for Bama. And the bcs ratings took a hit bc of Bama. It was bad college football. Yet it was all done for your team.

No, the voters voted for who they thought the second best team was. ESPN, the illuminati or martians from space had no control over that. The individual voters combined with the agreed upon computer formula. The formula in agreement before the season started was followed. Nothing was "done" for Bama, unless all the voters got together in some grand conspiracy (not likely although I see yall love those kinds of theories here!!!)

quote:
Your team got a handout, and youre too stupid to understand why the fans of other teams might be a bit resentful.

I dont see fans of other teams in here. I see LSU fans that were dumb to realize they got lucky the first time and are looking for anything to justify the prison raping we laid on yall this time.

Oh and the second title in three years. Man. nice to say that!!!!

4 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board