- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sure Wish LSU Was Playing Stanford or OSU
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:02 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:02 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Played worse competition, have a crappy defense, lost to Iowa State. Bama and LSU are in a league by themselves. Bottom line, OSU is closer to Arkansas in quality than it is LSU or Bama
Okie's schedule was better than Bama's. They have a crppy defense but a good offense. Okie is probably comparable to Ark, and Bama is probably much better, i agree with u. But in every other year teams are judged by their body of work. Not by eye tests or defensive stats. Which is a good thing bc lsu probably fails the eyeball test in 2007. Georgia and USC were both looking better.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:06 pm to biglego
quote:
Played worse competition, have a crappy defense, lost to Iowa State. Bama and LSU are in a league by themselves. Bottom line, OSU is closer to Arkansas in quality than it is LSU or Bama
OSU's schedule was inflated with the likes of Baylor and KSU, which are good but not great teams. The BCS isn't defined by body of work, and I imagine most people who vote do so for the best team, not the one who has the best body of work. You can look at the wins all you want, but look at the losses as well, Iowa State blows.
The BCS got it right. OSU has a phenom WR, and a QB who would be in his prime in the NFL, age wise. Nothing else.
Played worse competition, have a crappy defense, lost to Iowa State. Bama and LSU are in a league by themselves. Bottom line, OSU is closer to Arkansas in quality than it is LSU or Bama
quote:
Okie's schedule was better than Bama's. They have a crppy defense but a good offense. Okie is probably comparable to Ark, and Bama is probably much better, i agree with u. But in every other year teams are judged by their body of work. Not by eye tests or defensive stats. Which is a good thing bc lsu probably fails the eyeball test in 2007. Georgia and USC were both looking better.
OSU's schedule was inflated with the likes of Baylor and KSU, which are good but not great teams. The BCS isn't defined by body of work, and I imagine most people who vote do so for the best team, not the one who has the best body of work. You can look at the wins all you want, but look at the losses as well, Iowa State blows.
The BCS got it right. OSU has a phenom WR, and a QB who would be in his prime in the NFL, age wise. Nothing else.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News