- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU has faced 3 of the nations top 5 rushers
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:28 am to DucksflyinPAC
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:28 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
LMJ of Oregon did not play the whole virtual second half and some of the first half because of getting nasty craps and a ankle injury due to having it stepped on bad. Thus we will never know how many yards he would of got vs you if he had been able to play and not be injured...
You were also down 20 in the second half at several points
Not really conducive to a run heavy offense
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:44 am to cajunjj
quote:
Ducky, this sounds like sour grapes. I am truly sorry as I liked Oregon. I enjoyed the game & watched them all season.Good luck in the bowl.
Thanks. Out West we are ingrained to believe it all really is about the Rose Bowl. And not winning one for too many years to count has been the source of much shame at UO for a long while.
Actually I am not sour at the LSU loss with you all at all. I never started any of this or intended to bring up anything. I am not bitter. But I just cannot stand people with peanuts for logic skills, ie Rantards...
Likewise, good luck on your bowl game with Bama. Ever since you beat us I knew you were the best team in the county. And I hoped you would go undefeated and win it all.
Nothing at all personal with LSU, but I will not be watching your Natty with Bama. I know many who are boycotting the Natty because they think it is unfair to have Same Conference play Same Conference for a Natty. I agree with them. And we think the BCS is broken and needs fixed. No team should ever play for a Natty unless they win their Conference(which means only 1 team per Conference in it). Your Coach Miles said the same thing in 2007.
I and many others will wake up the next morning and just read who won. And while I always pull for my fellow PAC brothers in OOC games or Bowl games, for the Stanford game I am hoping Stanford gets crushed. Why is because if Okie Lite beats them bad, that will tick off Big 12 people even more that Okie Lite got robbed by not playing and SEC got bias treatment. Thus, it might force the BCS to change somewhat. Maybe a plus 1 or 2 will come of it. And I am hoping LSU crushes Bama bad to prove that Bama should of never been there.
I feel it is very corrupt to think this is a National Title game when only 2 teams from the same Conference are playing in it. It cannot by definition be truly a "National" title as it is not a National game. It is only a Conference division rematch, nothing more, nothing less. This is how all the rest of the country, non deep South, views this.
Hopefully there are enough pissed off Conference Directors by not being able to have one of their teams get a shot at you, plus bad TV ratings, plus another snoozefeast(to all us non SEC fans) of a LSU-Bama game, plus Okie Lite thumping a great Stanford team-showing they were more worthy to get to play with you, and many changes happen as a result.
But good luck in your Natty. I hope you get your third Crystal ball. You earned it. You proved by your incredibly hard schedule that you were the best. And you had the balls to schedule very hard OOC- which is very un SEC like = much respect from me!
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:48 am to DucksflyinPAC
Oregon fan,
Just accept the arse beating and move on. You are making your entire program look ridiculous in this thread.
PS: Try to win your damn bowl game this year. Please don't be embarrassed again by a "slow" Big 10 team.
Just accept the arse beating and move on. You are making your entire program look ridiculous in this thread.
PS: Try to win your damn bowl game this year. Please don't be embarrassed again by a "slow" Big 10 team.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:48 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Actually if LMJ had not had nasty cramps and a damaged ankle from getting stepped on
If's are for losers
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:48 am to DucksflyinPAC
I'm using your logic by adding the two carries to get the average number of carries he's had per game.
Ok, so he came out hurt. He was averaging 3 yards a carry. You're saying that OU would continued to feed LMJ the rock even though he wasn't gaining anything?
What's your excuse for him gaining so few yards before he was hurt? You somehow believe that if LMJ wasn't hurt and was able to carry the ball 30+ times he would have broke out for 200 yards?
I throw your question back at you:
Ok, so he came out hurt. He was averaging 3 yards a carry. You're saying that OU would continued to feed LMJ the rock even though he wasn't gaining anything?
What's your excuse for him gaining so few yards before he was hurt? You somehow believe that if LMJ wasn't hurt and was able to carry the ball 30+ times he would have broke out for 200 yards?
I throw your question back at you:
quote:
Sir, are you a retard?
This post was edited on 12/18/11 at 9:51 am
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:51 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
LMJ left the game injured in the middle of the second quarter. He did not play the whole virtual second half. I say virtual because he returned the first kickoff in the 2nd half but after that return attempt he came limping off and never returned. His cramping was just too bad for him that day and his ankle got messed up by being stepped on by a LSU player.
so you're mad that LSU made his arse quit?
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:04 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
LMJ of Oregon did not play the whole virtual second half and some of the first half because of getting nasty craps and a ankle injury due to having it stepped on bad. Thus we will never know how many yards he would of got vs you if he had been able to play and not be injured...
This post was edited on 12/18/11 at 10:05 am
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:14 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
LMJ of Oregon did not play the whole virtual second half and some of the first half because of getting nasty craps and a ankle injury due to having it stepped on bad
Made his arse quit.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:27 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
All I am suggesting is that LMJ would not of allowed your players to strip it from him. And with LMJ in there, no turnover happen, points probably get scored by us = Oregon in a big route.
Do you score more or less than the 13 you scored in the first half with LMJ playing? Doesn't seem like he did a great job scoring for you guys.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:27 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
then he would of been doing all kickoff returns
Huh....I don't remember LMJ doing kickoff returns.
You should have just ignored the thread tbh.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:28 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
DucksflyinPAC
You sir, are quite delusional. The if's, and's, or but's are strong with you. LMJ did jack shite against our D in the first half, and he had plenty the opportunity. To think that would change if he stayed in the game is a guess at best. You say he gains most of his yards in the 2nd half, well I'll have you know our D buckles down better in the second half. We rotate 9 deep and they don't get tired. LMJ would have had the same success as the first half, not to mention ya'll were down big and running wouldn't be the best choice.
We've heard it all season, starting with you Oregon fans, LSU didn't win, ya'll just made too many mistakes. After a while, and after it happens every single week, this argument falls on deaf ears, we beat every team the same way. If you like to think it's simply b/c you lost the game, fine, but moral victories don't have trophies. Win the Rose bowl and do everyone a favor and stop making excuses.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:30 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
We did had more yardage then you, even while gift wrapping fumbles near the end zone giving you easy scores, we still had more yardage then you
Wait. You're telling me that even with the short field that LSU's defense gave the offense that LSU couldn't outgain Oregon? I am shocked.
moron.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:34 am to DrTyger
quote:
What's your excuse for him gaining so few yards before he was hurt? You somehow believe that if LMJ wasn't hurt and was able to carry the ball 30+ times he would have broke out for 200 yards?
You like to spin things I see...
So how is only playing 1.5 quarters of CFB and getting 54 yards with that called gaining so few? Imagine him not getting injured and just by simple math him playing 4 whole quarters... plus as I stated earlier LMJ gets two thirds of all his seasons yards in the second half(a half which he never got to play...) and there is where I come up with my guess of 150, not 200, as you lied in your attempt to quote me.
And if you think any team with the Nations single leading rusher on it, would not give the ball more then 2 more times to their single best player and Nations best Rusher in the other 2.5 quarters that he did not play, then I was correct, you are retarded.
I never started any of this. All I did was post to a OP that listed my teams best player, and Nations 2nd time leading rusher a explanation on why he only got 54 yards vs your LSU. The fact that he only played 1.5 quarters of ball vs you, and unable to play any more due to injury should be very logical. I am sorry this is over your head...
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:36 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
So how is only playing 1.5 quarters of CFB and getting 54 yards with that called gaining so few?
On 18 carries. 3 yards per fricking carry. That's how.
This post was edited on 12/18/11 at 10:37 am
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:38 am to DrTyger
Had forgotten bout Rainey. Kid was a beast. Imagine what he could do with a good OL.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:39 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
So how is only playing 1.5 quarters of CFB
So now it's only 1.5 quarters? Because he was still running the ball on Oregon's last possession of the first half - a drive which started with 44 seconds left.
quote:
1st and 10 at ORE 26 LaMichael James rush for a loss of 1 yard to the Oregn 25.
Oh and he was in on the very first possession of the 3rd quarter too. Interesting method of saying 1.5 quarters.
And you scored 13 points in a half with James playing. So how many more points do you score in the 2nd half with him?
This post was edited on 12/18/11 at 10:44 am
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:43 am to DrTyger
LMJ is a product of his offense. He is a decent back. He is a great back for that hurry up offense. Look at his stats last year against TENN. He barely had what 25 yds. in the first half against them and then when Tenn. got wore down "the pace of your offense" he was successful. The only difference in our game is our players didn't wear down. We made him quit. Spin it however you would like, but I gurantee your coach wouldn't want to schedule us again.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:43 am to LSUintheNW
quote:
Huh....I don't remember LMJ doing kickoff returns. You should have just ignored the thread tbh.
Actually LMJ did attempt the kickoff return to start the 2nd half. It was a test to see if his cramps and injured ankle were better. He came off the field after that return limping very badly.
Also, I have been watching your posts much all year. You are a classic pretender of a fan. You are not a Duck. And you will never be so. It would be nice if one day you quit pretending to be one to your fellow LSU fans... Having lived in Oregon does not make one a Duck. Any true Duck can easily smell you out a mile away just to let you know...I know your post just now has nothing to do with my words now, but I have seen you much pretend to be a Duck for many months now. Please quit as you are not one of us.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:45 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
LMJ would easily be in the top 5 of nations CFB fastest runners.
You can stop with the stupidity at any time. There is a difference between quick and fast. LMJ is quick and less fast.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:46 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Please quit as you are not one of us.
Lucky for him. And Since you keep sidestepping it how many more points than the 13 Oregon scored in the 1st, with a healthy James, does Oregon score in the 2nd half if James is fully healthy?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News