quote:

---

quote: I call BS. According to espn he had a rush late in the 4th. I have seen the game around 10 times or more. I do not remember seeing LMJ in the game after the first play in the 2nd half. However I do not think you would lie.... so I will believe you. Well, so we just put him in for one play in the 4th then, after fumbling the ball 3 times, and we were desperate for a change and wanted to see if LMJ's ankle and nasty cramps could be subsided any and he might help us. I bet he right away came off the field limping. I do remember that game that whenever we tried to put him out there, he just came right back off limping and unable to hardly walk... So even if you are right and he played one freakin play more in the 4th, does that at all negate my point? Ok, so he did not play 99.7 percent of the 4th instead of 99.8 percent. Jackwagon...

---

quote:

---

I have seen the game around 10 times or more.

---

quote:

---

Actually if LMJ had not had nasty cramps and a damaged ankle from getting stepped on, to which forced him to miss 60 percent of the game, then he would of been doing all kickoff returns and runs and not Barner and the first CFB game ever played in, DAT. Thus, those 3 turnovers would not have happened. So you would easily have to take off 21 points for LSU that they got from those. That would mean Oregon would have won. Even more, had UO's players not fumbled the ball there is a decent chance that on some of those series we would have scored. Add even more points for Oregon. And it would of been Oregon in a blowout over LSU had LMJ gotten injured which forced us to go deep down in depth charts, which we ended up fumbling away the ball 3 times near our end zone for very easy scores against us. What a gift wrap to LSU that was. I will not suggest LSU did not have any skill at stripping the ball however, as indeed you all are very good at that. But LMJ would of not allowed him being stripped, had he not been injured and been able to play.

Sloppy turnovers can happen in games. And we did lose because of them. But as a guy that has seen that game now maybe 15 times... if one is so blind that they cannot see if UO did not play sloppy(those turnovers) 2 of those turnovers by a 18 year old kid who was playing in his first ever CFB game- only forced to put him in because #1 (LMJ)and #2(Barner) were injured, then I do not know what to say to you other then you must be blind, have bad memory, or never take off your LSU bias glasses ever.

---