- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nothing wrong with the idea of a split title
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:56 am to manwich
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:56 am to manwich
quote:
Do you really want to have to explain why your partial championship is valid?
I already have. It is valid because the AP says it is. The AP is expressing their OPINION. The BCS system expressed its OPINION. Every OBJECTIVE measure had Oklahoma St. playing in the game but the "eyeball test" but Bama in. It was corrupt.
Now, if Oklahoma St. had gotten in and beaten LSU and if the AP gave LSU their championship anyway, that would be ridiculous. I would think it was a joke and a dishonor ot OSU. It is only because it is Alabama, a team we already beat on their home field that the AP OPINION would have merit.
But, the AP might not even do this. It is speculative. If they did, though, it would be valid.
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:58 am to AlaTiger
quote:our definitions of valid are clearly very different
If they did, though, it would be valid.
Posted on 12/7/11 at 11:45 am to AlaTiger
quote:winning the AP and not the BCS trophy reminds me of another hollow celebration
It is valid because the AP says it is
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)