- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Cabin in the Woods. TulaneLSU's 2011-12 movie review thread
Posted on 11/16/11 at 7:33 am to TulaneLSU
Posted on 11/16/11 at 7:33 am to TulaneLSU
Tron: Legacy I did not see the original and have no intention of it. I quite liked this movie even though I don't usually like sci-fi. There's little connection I felt towards any of the characters, and blew most of their roles off as amalgamations of other characters, like from Star Wars to name one. Olivia Wilde is beautiful, the Beloved, and her closeup shots are mesmerizing. Some of the cosmic philosophies of the movie are interesting, as are the colors and action scenes. 6/10
True Grit I'm not a huge Western genre lover, but this movie is tightly wound and Bridges is at his best playing an old curmudgeon. Damon is annoying and I don't like the violence. Its use of biblical quotes is empty and an attempt to placate and stimulate shallow thinkers who think that a Bible quote thrown into a movie is somehow profound. 7/10
Warrior Last month, and not by my choosing, I had a meal at Stella! in the French Quarter. It was a meal of highs and lows. One course would soar. The next would flat-line. I couldn't help but to think of this meal as I watched Warrior. Warrior is a movie of flashes of brilliance, but meanders through confused, sentimental story telling.
The director's main fault is trying to make a movie about the brokenness of a family of emotionally constipated individuals into a movie about ring fighting. Ring fighting may have been the vehicle through which the family is remedied, but in a movie as short as Warrior, there wasn't room enough for the two masters to be served with due time. So while one could argue that both parts of the movie were necessary, I don't think any reasonable person would deny that the story suffered from the fight scenes, which are long, riveting, and well-made. The fight scenes will please a certain subset looking only for entertainment from movies, but those who want a broader experience will find those scenes cumbersome.
What I would have liked to have seen more of was Nick Nolte's and Tom Hardy's characters. There were great moments of chemistry between the two of them, the type that wins critical awards, but the director would shift too quickly from the depth of their shared anger, tergiversation, regret, and love. The metaphor used throughout the story is that of Ahab, the inveterate symbol of obsession and hate conquering a life. Warrior would have been laudable had it stuck to this theme, but what we are left with are two commendable, if short, scenes where Ahab is constructed and repudiated. Nolte especially is fantastic in these scenes. The rest of the two hours is not much more than sappy, cheesy Hollywood underdog fluff. Those whose emotions are easily twisted by those saccharine, homogenous pre-game inspirational stories that are so common in sports today will probably enjoy the movie, but serious movie-goers will walk away yearning for more realism and character. Less starch and more Japanese Mero Sea Bass, please. 5/10
Water for Elephants - Having seen the trailer for this movie, I assumed it would be a fantasy movie based in a circus world. Boy was I wrong. This movie tries to be in less than two hours a documentary on the Great Depression and circus life, a story justifying adultery and breaking the law, and a cheap imitation of The Notebook. Fail. Fail. Fail. The only good performance in the movie is the ring master. He's an interesting, if violent, figure. Reese Witherspoon? Who has she slept with to get role after role? She's a TERRIBLE actress and not even very attractive. I don't see how she has done a single movie since Pretty In Pink. Every movie I've seen in which she has starred has been horrible. This movie is no exception. 2/10
True Grit I'm not a huge Western genre lover, but this movie is tightly wound and Bridges is at his best playing an old curmudgeon. Damon is annoying and I don't like the violence. Its use of biblical quotes is empty and an attempt to placate and stimulate shallow thinkers who think that a Bible quote thrown into a movie is somehow profound. 7/10
Warrior Last month, and not by my choosing, I had a meal at Stella! in the French Quarter. It was a meal of highs and lows. One course would soar. The next would flat-line. I couldn't help but to think of this meal as I watched Warrior. Warrior is a movie of flashes of brilliance, but meanders through confused, sentimental story telling.
The director's main fault is trying to make a movie about the brokenness of a family of emotionally constipated individuals into a movie about ring fighting. Ring fighting may have been the vehicle through which the family is remedied, but in a movie as short as Warrior, there wasn't room enough for the two masters to be served with due time. So while one could argue that both parts of the movie were necessary, I don't think any reasonable person would deny that the story suffered from the fight scenes, which are long, riveting, and well-made. The fight scenes will please a certain subset looking only for entertainment from movies, but those who want a broader experience will find those scenes cumbersome.
What I would have liked to have seen more of was Nick Nolte's and Tom Hardy's characters. There were great moments of chemistry between the two of them, the type that wins critical awards, but the director would shift too quickly from the depth of their shared anger, tergiversation, regret, and love. The metaphor used throughout the story is that of Ahab, the inveterate symbol of obsession and hate conquering a life. Warrior would have been laudable had it stuck to this theme, but what we are left with are two commendable, if short, scenes where Ahab is constructed and repudiated. Nolte especially is fantastic in these scenes. The rest of the two hours is not much more than sappy, cheesy Hollywood underdog fluff. Those whose emotions are easily twisted by those saccharine, homogenous pre-game inspirational stories that are so common in sports today will probably enjoy the movie, but serious movie-goers will walk away yearning for more realism and character. Less starch and more Japanese Mero Sea Bass, please. 5/10
Water for Elephants - Having seen the trailer for this movie, I assumed it would be a fantasy movie based in a circus world. Boy was I wrong. This movie tries to be in less than two hours a documentary on the Great Depression and circus life, a story justifying adultery and breaking the law, and a cheap imitation of The Notebook. Fail. Fail. Fail. The only good performance in the movie is the ring master. He's an interesting, if violent, figure. Reese Witherspoon? Who has she slept with to get role after role? She's a TERRIBLE actress and not even very attractive. I don't see how she has done a single movie since Pretty In Pink. Every movie I've seen in which she has starred has been horrible. This movie is no exception. 2/10
This post was edited on 11/16/11 at 7:35 am
3
Posted on 11/16/11 at 7:33 am to TulaneLSU
What's Your Number? When the revivalist preacher, Charles Finney, was in the midst of the Second Great Awakening, he preached these words: "Sin consists in a known and voluntary neglect to know and obey God, and to love our neighbor as ourselves...True confession implies that we cease from all known sin, of either omission, or commission. Also, that we cease from all excuses or apologies for sin." It wasn't unusual for Finney and other camp revivalists to preach for hours on the meaning of sin. Their practices helped form a lot of the sin-centric preaching of modern day revivalist preaching. Never before appreciated, however, is how Finney and his contemporaries have implicitly shaped a new genre of Hollywood movies: the Sinner morality play.
What I mean by Sinner morality play is that it focuses for the vast majority of its length on the sin of people and society. But unlike the revivalists, the movie almost promotes this lifestyle as normal. In What's Your Number? the sin is promiscuous sex. Gone are the mores of sex for marriage. In their places we learn that it's normal, even encouraged, for the unmarried to have sex, just so long as you don't have sex with more people than some imaginary moral number (10 is given in this movie). All the while, we are taught to believe in the movie that there's nothing wrong with unfettered sex, but at the very end, just as in Finney's preaching, there is a come to Jesus moment. There is a moment when the characters realize that sin is wrong, undesirable, and has caused all their hurt and dissatisfaction with life. Granted, there is no Jesus: the savior in this movie, like in much of American culture, even what passes as Christian culture, is self-realization. What causes conversion in this movie is the movement from pleasing others to pleasing the self. This, of course, does not fit into the Christian model, where we are to please God and it is God's grace that brings us to conversion, not self-realization.
There are many movies being made today that share this pattern of sin, sin, sin, sin, self-realization, conversion, rejection of sin. Sadly, a majority of the romantic comedies, movies like No Strings Attached and One Day, and even movies like The Hangover have a similar structure. Revel in the bad for the first 95 minutes. Then hit a moral point in the last five minutes of the movie. Personally, while I like ending on a positive note, I find it patronizing. Americans always want to end on a positive note, but the real take home message in such movies is the morality the movie implies for the majority of the movie, usually one of debauchery and devilishness. I'm not easily fooled.
There are several hilarious scenes; my favorite was the darts scene, and I like the final message of the film. However, I cannot give a high rating to a movie that plays in the mud all day long only to take a shower at midnight. 4/10
What I mean by Sinner morality play is that it focuses for the vast majority of its length on the sin of people and society. But unlike the revivalists, the movie almost promotes this lifestyle as normal. In What's Your Number? the sin is promiscuous sex. Gone are the mores of sex for marriage. In their places we learn that it's normal, even encouraged, for the unmarried to have sex, just so long as you don't have sex with more people than some imaginary moral number (10 is given in this movie). All the while, we are taught to believe in the movie that there's nothing wrong with unfettered sex, but at the very end, just as in Finney's preaching, there is a come to Jesus moment. There is a moment when the characters realize that sin is wrong, undesirable, and has caused all their hurt and dissatisfaction with life. Granted, there is no Jesus: the savior in this movie, like in much of American culture, even what passes as Christian culture, is self-realization. What causes conversion in this movie is the movement from pleasing others to pleasing the self. This, of course, does not fit into the Christian model, where we are to please God and it is God's grace that brings us to conversion, not self-realization.
There are many movies being made today that share this pattern of sin, sin, sin, sin, self-realization, conversion, rejection of sin. Sadly, a majority of the romantic comedies, movies like No Strings Attached and One Day, and even movies like The Hangover have a similar structure. Revel in the bad for the first 95 minutes. Then hit a moral point in the last five minutes of the movie. Personally, while I like ending on a positive note, I find it patronizing. Americans always want to end on a positive note, but the real take home message in such movies is the morality the movie implies for the majority of the movie, usually one of debauchery and devilishness. I'm not easily fooled.
There are several hilarious scenes; my favorite was the darts scene, and I like the final message of the film. However, I cannot give a high rating to a movie that plays in the mud all day long only to take a shower at midnight. 4/10
This post was edited on 11/16/11 at 7:35 am
Posted on 12/8/11 at 4:24 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
Reese Witherspoon? Who has she slept with to get role after role? She's a TERRIBLE actress and not even very attractive. I don't see how she has done a single movie since Pretty In Pink. Every movie I've seen in which she has starred has been horrible. This movie is no exception
You're kidding right?
Posted on 12/13/11 at 1:00 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
Tron: Legacy I did not see the original and have no intention of it. I quite liked this movie even though I don't usually like sci-fi. There's little connection I felt towards any of the characters, and blew most of their roles off as amalgamations of other characters, like from Star Wars to name one. Olivia Wilde is beautiful, the Beloved, and her closeup shots are mesmerizing. Some of the cosmic philosophies of the movie are interesting, as are the colors and action scenes. 6/10
True Grit I'm not a huge Western genre lover, but this movie is tightly wound and Bridges is at his best playing an old curmudgeon. Damon is annoying and I don't like the violence. Its use of biblical quotes is empty and an attempt to placate and stimulate shallow thinkers who think that a Bible quote thrown into a movie is somehow profound. 7/10
Warrior Last month, and not by my choosing, I had a meal at Stella! in the French Quarter. It was a meal of highs and lows. One course would soar. The next would flat-line. I couldn't help but to think of this meal as I watched Warrior. Warrior is a movie of flashes of brilliance, but meanders through confused, sentimental story telling.
The director's main fault is trying to make a movie about the brokenness of a family of emotionally constipated individuals into a movie about ring fighting. Ring fighting may have been the vehicle through which the family is remedied, but in a movie as short as Warrior, there wasn't room enough for the two masters to be served with due time. So while one could argue that both parts of the movie were necessary, I don't think any reasonable person would deny that the story suffered from the fight scenes, which are long, riveting, and well-made. The fight scenes will please a certain subset looking only for entertainment from movies, but those who want a broader experience will find those scenes cumbersome.
What I would have liked to have seen more of was Nick Nolte's and Tom Hardy's characters. There were great moments of chemistry between the two of them, the type that wins critical awards, but the director would shift too quickly from the depth of their shared anger, tergiversation, regret, and love. The metaphor used throughout the story is that of Ahab, the inveterate symbol of obsession and hate conquering a life. Warrior would have been laudable had it stuck to this theme, but what we are left with are two commendable, if short, scenes where Ahab is constructed and repudiated. Nolte especially is fantastic in these scenes. The rest of the two hours is not much more than sappy, cheesy Hollywood underdog fluff. Those whose emotions are easily twisted by those saccharine, homogenous pre-game inspirational stories that are so common in sports today will probably enjoy the movie, but serious movie-goers will walk away yearning for more realism and character. Less starch and more Japanese Mero Sea Bass, please. 5/10
Water for Elephants - Having seen the trailer for this movie, I assumed it would be a fantasy movie based in a circus world. Boy was I wrong. This movie tries to be in less than two hours a documentary on the Great Depression and circus life, a story justifying adultery and breaking the law, and a cheap imitation of The Notebook. Fail. Fail. Fail. The only good performance in the movie is the ring master. He's an interesting, if violent, figure. Reese Witherspoon? Who has she slept with to get role after role? She's a TERRIBLE actress and not even very attractive. I don't see how she has done a single movie since Pretty In Pink. Every movie I've seen in which she has starred has been horrible. This movie is no exception. 2/10
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News