Started By
Message

re: What moron decided that Tulane should leave the SEC in 1966?

Posted on 10/27/11 at 4:49 pm to
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22050 posts
Posted on 10/27/11 at 4:49 pm to
Very serious...in hindsight, it was a terrible move. How is Vandy able to survive the SEC? How does Northwestern survive the Big Ten, or Stanford survive the PAC-12?

How much money and exposure did Tulane lose by leaving the SEC?



Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 10/27/11 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

How is Vandy able to survive the SEC?


Good question. Vandy is comparable to Tulane up until 1966. And Vandy hasn't finished in the AP poll since 1948. They have 4 winning seasons since 1959.

quote:

How does Northwestern survive the Big Ten, or Stanford survive the PAC-12?


Both those schools can find their way to the Rose Bowl now and again. And Northwestern and Stanford are in huge metros so that is a big plus for their respective conferences. Odds of Vandy ever making it to the Sugar Bowl? Negative. I honestly think the SEC hasn't run Vandy off simply because they boost our academic standing.

Long story short, Vandy has profited financially as you say. But could Tulane have predicted that in 1966, long before cable TV and ESPN would revolutionize the TV market? It was a very different world then.
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 10/27/11 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Very serious...in hindsight, it was a terrible move


Wouldn't it have made more sense for Georgia Tech to remain in the SEC than either Tulane or Vandy?

They were fairly competitive in the 50s and 60s under Bobby Dodd.
This post was edited on 10/27/11 at 5:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram