How about #10 passing efficiency in the nation.
#1 Red Zone efficiency.
#1 in Turnovers.
JL has a higher QB rating than AJM
Beating top notch teams by double digits
JJ's maneuvering abilities speak for themselves. I have yet to see any indication that having two QBs is hurting the other QB. They both get their shots and they both make huge plays. And Les even said JL is our starting QB. It's done. No controversy.

It's all just blown out of proportion. I guess if you look in the grand scheme of things, QB is one of our weaker positions just because it isn't the same caliber as the rest of the team. But its far from an issue.

quote:
Is there any proof that it is better than just having Lee out there? Or just Jordan out there?

Ok I'll break it down. Yes, its better than just having JL.
1.) Our offense has gotten better with the addition of JJ. The highlight reals, scoreboards, and stats show that.
2.) I think we both know its better to have both QBs than just Jordan. We all know how JL had to bail us out of bad places several times last year. If it wasn't for him, we might have lost 2 or more games than we did.
3.) I think there's no arguing its great to have depth at QB. Think about Auburn last year when Nick Fairly took out both of our QBs almost consecutively. We were stuck with some random kid no one ever heard of before. That didn't turn out so well. We now have great depth at even QB!
-JL gets hurt, send in an equally experienced QB, JJ
-JJ gets hurt, send in a very talented QB with some playing experience, Mett
-Mett gets hurt, send in a very athletic and talented freshman, Randal
-Randal gets hurt, send in the super tall and supposedly accurate freshman, Rivers. (this is where things start to get ugly, but you get the point).

What I'm trying to say is, it's a non-issue.

This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 12:24 am