- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 10/25/11 at 6:44 pm to Dr RC
I would not believe those numbers at all, considering he forgot to deduct what A&M and Missouri would have to be paid to equal the current payout..
Just back of the napkin...
61M - 36M (A&M and Mizzou at 18m per) is 25M. Then divide by 14...
That is closer to 2 than 4.5 and that is going with the subscriber rate concept that does not really work with how the TV deals are going to play out.
I can agree with the 4.4M figure as long as you preface with +/-3M
Just back of the napkin...
61M - 36M (A&M and Mizzou at 18m per) is 25M. Then divide by 14...
That is closer to 2 than 4.5 and that is going with the subscriber rate concept that does not really work with how the TV deals are going to play out.
I can agree with the 4.4M figure as long as you preface with +/-3M
Posted on 10/25/11 at 6:46 pm to Dr RC
quote:
if you consider "There are reasons the SEC wants Mizzou and not WVU" as pure vitriol you need thicker skin.
Clearly you did not read the response in context, nor his others. Pure vitriol, indeed; but I doubt he is a graduate from this school of such high academic esteem. And my skin is already as thick as it needs be; I simply despise lunacy.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News