- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The next time someone says Big 12 is smarter than SEC,
Posted on 10/25/11 at 9:59 pm to Dilrod
Posted on 10/25/11 at 9:59 pm to Dilrod
quote:
i wonder how many of these aggie posters thumbing their noise up at other schools actually went to TAMU
All of us.
WVU fans, we are not saying your degree is worthless or anything. I understand your argument, but allowing everyone in who meets a low requirement like a 2.0 or a 910 SAT score will affect your University's reputation. A&M and Texas admission are extremely, extremely competitive. Texas A&M is considered a "research" institution, which is very different from a "teaching" University. Students at A&M get the opportunity to participate in research projects that usually graduate students do because of their academic ability and the competitive admission they had to go through to get in. Not only that, but TAMU and other "research" institutions teach you how to research and problem solve from day one. Heck, one of my good friends was published as an undergraduate during his junior year, graduated with a degree in Biomedical Science (an extremely difficult degree at A&M, and he came from New York to be a part of it as a first generation Aggie) and is about to graduate from Johns Hopkins after working in a medical research department at Georgetown for two years without a graduate degree.
Point is, competitive admission has a purpose.
Posted on 10/25/11 at 10:04 pm to NonregAg09
Texas higher education vs WV higher education is an apples to oranges comparison. Texas and A&M as state schools have lower schools (like UT-Arlington, UTEP, TTech, Houston, UT-D, UT-SA, and many others) to ensure that the lesser students have a shot at a degree. WV is not a populous enough state to warrant many schools, so they have one big one that covers the range from good in-state students to not so good ones. Their mission has to be different than that of A&M and Texas.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:40 am to NonregAg09
quote:
WVU fans, we are not saying your degree is worthless or anything
Yeah, I'm happy with my education. I could've gone anywhere as a National Merit Scholar, and because I completely aced the ACT with a 36 and missed one or two questions on the SAT to score 1590 (out of 1600 back then, have heard the scoring system has since changed). I'm making six figures, so I definitely can not complain, although I did have to move out of state to accomplish that even as an engineer because WV's economy is very poor with not enough jobs and too many people wanting them. I stayed in-state for my education because my dear mom wasn't doing very well health-wise at the time and I wanted to remain close by... just a personal choice.
Anyway, I recognize that WVU is not on par academically with the Michigans and Vanderbilts of the world and probably never will be. The school does have some very good students, as indicated by our number of Rhodes Scholars, but also has far more than its fair share of stinkers.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News