- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why was Lee named starting QB over Mettenberger?
Posted on 8/28/11 at 5:53 pm to TexanPete
Posted on 8/28/11 at 5:53 pm to TexanPete
If anything, Lee showed us in his RS Frosh campaign exactly why Mettenberger shouldn't be the starter. What I'm saying is that the reason Lee failed in that season was that he hadn't been given enough time to grasp the offense, hadn't been exposed to SEC defenses and had to expand upon his overall maturation as a D-1 quarterback.
Thus, we have precedent here suggesting NOT to start Mett until he's proven to be capable of running the offense, more talented than Lee or not.
Thus, we have precedent here suggesting NOT to start Mett until he's proven to be capable of running the offense, more talented than Lee or not.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News