Started By
Message

re: What can DNA prove in this case?

Posted on 8/25/11 at 10:09 am to
Posted by tc5140
Member since Jul 2009
782 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 10:09 am to
Nobody stated (which was officially released) that somebody kicked him in his back so the shirt fiber shite doesn't make sense. You would probably find the sweat of 20 people up there
--------------------------------------------
I should had said sweat from inside the shoe. Only JJ sweat should be in the shoe, which confirms its his shoe.
--------------------------------------------
along with blood spit or whatever else so again this makes no sense on that part either.
--------------------------------------------
Confirms the shoe from above was the shoe he wore that night.

Conclusion is JJ shoe not someone else who was there that night. The shoe confirmed was at fight.
Finally does that shoe have a shirt fiber on it?

This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 10:13 am
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26708 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 10:23 am to
I really can't believe that he would lie about being there. shite just about EVERYBODY was there. I think they are just running a bunch of tests so when nothing comes up it can be concluded, by the media and masses, that they did a thorough investigation.
Posted by WindboyCajun
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2011
1056 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 10:27 am to
All this points to the Feds being involved in the investigation, along with the BRPD and LSP, because a soldier in the Marine Corps was involved either as victim or instigator. Bet they turn around this DNA findings within days. Another sign that Feds are in the mix. It will not be pretty.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram