Started By
Message

re: What can DNA prove in this case?

Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:57 am to
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26708 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:57 am to
Nobody stated (which was officially released) that somebody kicked him in his back so the shirt fiber shite doesn't make sense. You would probably find the sweat of 20 people up there along with blood spit or whatever else so again this makes no sense on that part either. Finding blood on his shoe makes no sense because the likelihood of JJ being the only one near the fight with blood of any kind on him is far fetched to say the least.
Posted by tc5140
Member since Jul 2009
782 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 10:09 am to
Nobody stated (which was officially released) that somebody kicked him in his back so the shirt fiber shite doesn't make sense. You would probably find the sweat of 20 people up there
--------------------------------------------
I should had said sweat from inside the shoe. Only JJ sweat should be in the shoe, which confirms its his shoe.
--------------------------------------------
along with blood spit or whatever else so again this makes no sense on that part either.
--------------------------------------------
Confirms the shoe from above was the shoe he wore that night.

Conclusion is JJ shoe not someone else who was there that night. The shoe confirmed was at fight.
Finally does that shoe have a shirt fiber on it?

This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 10:13 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram