- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When will someone put the smackdown on the NCAA?
Posted on 7/24/11 at 4:03 pm to LSU GrandDad
Posted on 7/24/11 at 4:03 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:This...
Yes they can. They can bring back the athletic dorms along with all other necessities that a young man or woman athlete/student needs in order to be just that an athlete-student for the university(training table etc.). It would at least centralize everything and bullshite situations like this one might at least be reduced. Oh but some liberal tree huggin academiac thinks that is showing preferential treatment. Nevermind the fact that 80% of their time is owned by the university and millions of dollars are made many of which go to each universities general fund and more importantly pay these pricks salaries so they can spend their time justifying themselves undergoing investigations like this.
quote:...and this!
it's a thought. to me, that's throwing the baby out with the bathwater but by alleviating a segment of ametuer sports and making it pro what will happen? i'm a saints fan and they don't have all of these rules. but i went to college at LSU and, to me, the university is the reason why the football team exists not the reverse. my personal opinion is that we keep it as ameteur as possible but i would still be a fan of LSU's semi-pro football team. in my day, there were athletic dorms and the athletes got $25 per week "laundry money" (about $250/week today) and they got 6 tickets to each home game to supposedly to give to their parents and friends but many were sold for xtra spending money. and then they had "summer jobs", some which were real jobs and some which were play jobs. now, the athlete gets none of that. it may be possible to work some in the summer but football is basically year round. therefore, i'm not at all opposed to providing spending money , HOWEVER, nowdays the same amount would have to be provided to ALL ATHLETES; male, female, track, volleyball, lacrosse, etc. most schools could not afford this so they would cut non-revenue sports and therefore cut scholarships down to the bone. i wish there was a way that all college athletes could get spending money included in their scholarship, at least a reasonable amount. it would not put much of a dent in the cheating though; some people would always want more and some alumni would always want them to have more.
Also justifiable since they are not allowed by rule to work during the school year and don't have the time during the summer - pay a supplement only to revenue producing sport athletes based on a percentage of revenue (individual, conference, or national average).
Posted on 7/24/11 at 4:12 pm to DVtiger
YES! YES! YES! Why is that so hard. Fire these S.O.B.'s that are acting like members of Congress(Go figure. They all need to be fired to.), make the changes back to a more centralized structure and Play Ball!
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News