Started By
Message

re: New OTL article on Lyles/LSU

Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:18 pm to
Posted by Spawn
Berlin
Member since Oct 2006
7070 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:18 pm to
So if we didn't pay him any money until December 2010, then he wasn't "on the payroll" of LSU in October 2009 when he accompnied Seastrunk et. al. to the LSU/Florida game. So no secondary violation there.
Obviously we recieved videos from him prior to paying him, so no problem there.
So even if the videos aren't very useful, what are we supposed to do? Stiff him? I'm guessing that would be some sort of NCAA violation as well. Soliciting recruiting videos then refusing to pay for them or at least bad business.

Sounds like a whole bunch of nothing to me.
This post was edited on 7/20/11 at 8:39 pm
Posted by The ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
825 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:20 pm to
i think he was paid in the past by LSU
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67280 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:22 pm to
Yeah this article is all spin> We have always said some of the material is old players currently in college. But they completely want to ignore all the video that is useful because that doesn't make us out to be doing something wrong.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram