- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deadly force to protect property not legal in this state
Posted on 5/18/11 at 11:10 pm to AlxTgr
Posted on 5/18/11 at 11:10 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
AlxTgr
Then you just shoot away. And I'll take the case against you.
But address the issue. You said that you would be covered by insurance. You WILL NOT be covered for intentional acts. I know you know that. Or I sure hope the hell so.
Prosecution? Dude, if you kill someone, the DA is going to have to take a serious look at it. If it is across racial lines, then in many, many parishes, there is going to be enormous pressure on the DA to prosecute no matter what the facts are.
I helped defend one here where a guy shot someone who he thought was trying to invade his home. We handled it pro bono, and we got him an exceptional deal, in part because it was a black shooter and a black victim. But it was not easy and it took a hell of a long time.
So how many burglar shooters have you defended?
1
Posted on 5/18/11 at 11:18 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:Fine, her it is. In a home invasion, which is all I'm talking about, there will be no suit. If there is this fantasy suit that won't happen, the shooter will be defended. Case is dismissed before trial. If this fantasy non-existant never going to happen suit goes to jury, the plaintiff(s) get zeroed. If this make believe group of irrational jurors award money, the shooter is covered because the plaintiff oriented judge already granted the plaintiff's summary judgment on coverage finding the exclusion vague and/that the shooter, while he intended to fire, did not intend bodily harm upon the poor home invader. If the summary judgment is not granted(ha ha) the shooter has nothing anyway, and is damn glad he offed the scum who could have killed his 4 year old while he slept.
But address the issue. You said that you would be covered by insurance. You WILL NOT be covered for intentional acts. I know you know that. Or I sure hope the hell so.
quote:No, just no.
Prosecution? Dude, if you kill someone, the DA is going to have to take a serious look at it.
quote:yeah, I'm sure that's what happened.
I helped defend one here where a guy shot someone who he thought was trying to invade his home
quote:Zero, because it never happens
So how many burglar shooters have you defended?
This post was edited on 5/18/11 at 11:20 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News