Started By
Message

re: Finally the SEC shows some stones and will face osu in their territory

Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by LSUROCKS52
Rest in Peace
Member since Oct 2003
56 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:29 pm to
arizona state was no worse the year before we went there than WVU was this past year. quit trying to bash on LSU
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36140 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

I just think Ohio State going to Texas and all the history that is there, and going to the Coliseum, then going to Norman, and Blackburg. It's just so much for for the fans, and is something the players will look back on(if they win ) and really love to remember.



it is dependent on the program to me

I would like to go see LSU play at USC, tOSU, Michigan, Texas, OU... stadiums of interest (great venues)

For most of the OOC possibilities I might prefer a neutral site... because many of them are kinda shitty places to travel

Traveling to WVU this year is going to be like raw dogging a working girl... even if you roger the shite out of her you probably walk away with a STD
Posted by paperstreet
Member since Feb 2011
7434 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

I really don't get why you don't like neutral site games

I like neutral site games. They are called Bowl Games.

As for regular season neutral site games.. I don't like them because I prefer the home/away. They generate just as much media coverage. I find myself to be a lot more interested to see two of the top teams in the country, go into each others houses in consecutive years and see them battle it out.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76551 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Traveling to WVU this year is going to be like raw dogging a working girl... even if you roger the shite out of her you probably walk away with a STD


I've been to Morgantown several times for games, and visiting friends. It is one of the best times of my life.

Just sayin.
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45794 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

has ohio state played one michigan directional school this decade?



Eastern fricking Michigan last year.

Holy frick you are retarded.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36140 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

find myself to be a lot more interested to see two of the top teams in the country, go into each others houses in consecutive years and see them battle it out.



for this situation? I agree

don't see much of that tho... we see maybe one premiere ooc matchup in all of the regular season most years

OSU/Texas and OSU/USC were good attempts at this IMO.

Posted by white_kong
Burbank
Member since Jan 2006
214 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:38 pm to
Let me get this straight, people in this thread are bashing LSU's schedule when they play Oregon, Florida, Alabama, Auburn, Miss State, Arkansas, West Virgina and Tennessee.

Clemson and Miami probably wouldn't be worth mentioning if they were on this schedule.
Posted by paperstreet
Member since Feb 2011
7434 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

OSU/Texas and OSU/USC were good attempts at this IMO.

That said though... I think I would actually like the idea of a neutral site regular season game if the two schools were close... example... LSU/Texas.

No flame on LSU but I mean this years game with Oregon.. Oregon has to travel over 2000 miles. LSU has to travel less than 500. And yes, Oregon did agree to it, not like they were forced to or anything. That's not what I'm trying to say.

I'm just saying that if the "neutral site" is that close to one school, and that far away from another, why not just have a home and away?

A game like LSU/Oregon is going to be is going to generate a shite ton of media interest no matter where the game is played.
This post was edited on 4/6/11 at 12:40 pm
Posted by paperstreet
Member since Feb 2011
7434 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Let me get this straight, people in this thread are bashing LSU's schedule when they play Oregon, Florida, Alabama, Auburn, Miss State, Arkansas, West Virgina and Tennessee.

I forgot. The SEC is the only conference with any sort of competition involved. They(for the most part) are allowed to schedule cupcakes OOC, while everyone else should schedule the top dogs.

and I was talking about the past. If you actually read the other posts too instead of just picking through them, I actually gave LSU a shite ton of credit for scheduling schools like TCU, OU, Oregon, West Virginia, UNC, etc.
This post was edited on 4/6/11 at 12:43 pm
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
43044 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:42 pm to
LSU played a home and home with OSU back in the 80's
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4644 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

As for regular season neutral site games.. I don't like them because I prefer the home/away.
You might prefer home and homes, but the neutral site game is preferable to the athletic department from a revenue standpoint.
quote:

They generate just as much media coverage.
But not as much revenue. LSU is making almost the same amount for playing in Dallas than a home game...and they don't have a return trip. It allows them to keep the same number of home games and add one more revenue producing game.

Last year, LSU played 7 home games and 1 neutral site game = 8 revenue producing games.
This year, LSU will play 6 home games and 1 neutral site game = 7 revenue producing games, but that is because they're playing at WVU.

7 revenue producing games is the key number. If not for the neutral site Oregon game, LSU would be playing a home game against someone....most likely a rent-a-win.
Posted by paperstreet
Member since Feb 2011
7434 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

But not as much revenue. LSU is making almost the same amount for playing in Dallas than a home game...and they don't have a return trip. It allows them to keep the same number of home games and add one more revenue producing game.

I get your point.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36140 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:46 pm to
quote:


No flame on LSU but I mean this years game with Oregon.. Oregon has to travel over 2000 miles. LSU has to travel less than 500.


two reasons:

1) may generate more money for the two programs per game played than doing a home/away
2) both programs want to recruit Texas

If the neutral site were in Florida and we were playing Ga Tech I'd still find that interesting (and worth doing to recruit in Florida)

FWIW Dallas at least is a major city that has flights all over the place... it might be a faster trip for them than taking a long bus trip to areas that are physically closer
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17500 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Vandy vs OSU September 2013.
Posted by Esarhaddon
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2006
19035 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:47 pm to
Didn't LSU play at OSU when Herby was their QB?
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4644 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

1) may generate more money for the two programs per game played than doing a home/away
It will.

quote:

LSU will earn $3.25 million to $3.5 million for the game, which eclipses the net the university hauls in for a home game against a non-BCS level program. Ausberry estimated that revenue is about $2.2 million.

LINK
Posted by paperstreet
Member since Feb 2011
7434 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

2) both programs want to recruit Texas

No doubt. It's going to be great exposure for them. I guess just personally, I don't care for all the revenue involved. But that's just me. College Football is a pretty big business, and will generate a lot of money... as it should.

And that's why I'm not a business man
This post was edited on 4/6/11 at 12:52 pm
Posted by white_kong
Burbank
Member since Jan 2006
214 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I forgot. The SEC is the only conference with any sort of competition involved. They(for the most part) are allowed to schedule cupcakes OOC, while everyone else should schedule the top dogs.


If you fail to see the difference in the need to schedule tough OOC opponents to garner respect between and ACC and SEC team you are a fool. Like I said no need to schedule powerhouses when you play the schedule LSU does as opposed to FSU. Beating on the likes of Clemson, Miami, and Maryland is cute, but you guys have to schedule the OU's of the world to be on par with the SEC.

Yes, sorry if this is the typical SEC chest boasting, but it is what it is (5 straight NC's).
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4644 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I don't care for all the revenue involved.
Agree and unfortunately, it is one of the reasons for the demise for home and homes.

I really enjoy getting to experience the gameday atmosphere at other schools outside the SEC.
Posted by WelcomeToDeathValley
1st & 1st
Member since Aug 2006
16947 posts
Posted on 4/6/11 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

LSU/Texas


I really dont get why they/we dont do a home and home every ____ amt of years.

This post was edited on 4/6/11 at 1:02 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram