Started By
Message

re: BRSA & Chris Mitchell.. What's the deal?

Posted on 3/3/11 at 7:32 am to
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19562 posts
Posted on 3/3/11 at 7:32 am to
quote:

BrandNew




IobviouslyDGAF about this as much as you do.

So, to simplify my argument:

Baton Rouge has a soccer league already, soccer league approaches parks commission, says "hey... you provide the land, we'll get some money and we'll provide the maintenance, and put people in the parks. Win - win for everybody."

New guy wants to start soccer league. Why doesn't new guy approach BREC and make the same deal? There's existing goals at the corner of Tiger Bend and Antioch, some in Highland Road park (I think) and a mess of them at Howell Park. I'm sure there are others that I can't think of. Why not take some of his club member's money and pay to maintain one of those? I'm sure BREC would jump at it in a heartbeat.

I didn't see where he was offering to pay to use anything.

And I don't care if it's Lafayatte, Chelsea or God's personal rec league team that wants to use the fields, I am 100% behind BRSA or BREC keeping them off the fields that *I* (and many others) pay to maintain.

USE THE OTHER FACILITIES.
Posted by BrandNew
Member since Aug 2010
330 posts
Posted on 3/3/11 at 12:16 pm to
I was just venting after a bad week and find I get into less trouble if I do that on here than IRL.

I agree with you. BREC agreed to give BRSA control of the fields in exchange for the improvements. LFC is SOL, unless BREC renegs on its agreement. And, I would keep others off the fields as much as possible if I was BRSA and paid to maintain the fields.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram