I think you're misinterpreting what they mean by the replacement quotient. The greater the proven talent, the lower the stars, not the higher. In other words, a team is in better shape with 3 stars rather than 5.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by L S Usetheforce

Member since Jun 2004

22800 posts

Posted on 1/22/11 at 8:12 am to Indiana Tiger

quote:
The greater the proven talent, the lower the stars, not the higher. In other words, a team is in better shape with 3 stars rather than 5.

Say what.............

And Shoe........I'm not denying Maize as a talent but if you gonna give Bama love for their experience, how are you not gonna be excited about our DB's returning minus PP? We have more of a proven commodity in that area than Bama WR's........

And a passing game requires QB execution as we wrote that book.........Bama will be breaking in youth there.

This post was edited on 1/22/11 at 8:14 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Mattdaddy311

Left of center

Member since Jan 2007

6193 posts

Posted on 1/22/11 at 11:29 am to Indiana Tiger

quote:
I think you're misinterpreting what they mean by the replacement quotient. The greater the proven talent, the lower the stars, not the higher. In other words, a team is in better shape with 3 stars rather than 5.

I think you're reaching on this one

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Champs

Geaux Tigers

Member since Feb 2008

11732 posts

Posted on 1/22/11 at 11:44 am to Indiana Tiger

quote:
I think you're misinterpreting what they mean by the replacement quotient. The greater the proven talent, the lower the stars, not the higher. In other words, a team is in better shape with 3 stars rather than 5

this...

5 stars means you might be in trouble if you cant fix

1 ...

Report Post

LSU Recruiting - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board