Started By
Message

re: Maryland Hire

Posted on 1/2/11 at 1:45 pm to
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 1/2/11 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

the Under Armour money,


yes

quote:

better recruiting area,


I disagree. Conn. can get guys from the north east which is a pretty good area.

quote:

probably a bigger commitment to football from the school.


Maryland is known as a basketball school so I find this hard to believe.
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44582 posts
Posted on 1/2/11 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Conn. can get guys from the north east which is a pretty good area.



I'd rather the MD/VA/DC area.

eta: not to mention he's closer to the areas he hits in the south for recruiting, and can sell kids on their folks being able to see them play in the ACC as opposed to up in the Big East.

quote:

Maryland is known as a basketball school so I find this hard to believe.



UConn's more hoops than Maryland is. Maryland just fired a successful (for them at least) head coach, and their big booster makes his money primarily off football apparel. seems they want a better football product, and are willing to spend to get it.
This post was edited on 1/2/11 at 1:58 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423378 posts
Posted on 1/2/11 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Conn. can get guys from the north east which is a pretty good area.


no it's not
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram