Started By
Message

re: New Big 10 Divisions: Legends and Leaders

Posted on 12/13/10 at 5:18 pm to
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36168 posts
Posted on 12/13/10 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

quote:



Cause it's not divided East/West?




Still would make more sense than legends and leaders


True. I actually wouldn't mind naming the divisions after two people (similar to what the NHL did in the old days with their divisions). Plains/Lakes seems weird (not as weird as Leaders/Legends, but still weird) and East/West kind of sort of fits, but not really. IDK what you could name them. Pretty much anything but what they did.

I read one person saying they should have had the logo black and blue and then name the divisions that, and build off the Big Ten's "power" stereotype. Thought that was kind of interesting.
Posted by Xenophon
Aspen
Member since Feb 2006
41276 posts
Posted on 12/13/10 at 5:20 pm to
Black and Blue would have been better.

Giving them names of Big10 greats would have been pretty cool, imo..

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram