Started By
Message

re: New Big 10 Divisions: Legends and Leaders

Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:31 pm to
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20770 posts
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:31 pm to
I could understand the "G" in Big looking like a "0" if they had changed the name of the conference. But when your name is still the Big 10, why is there a need to pay homage to the old name? As said before if they could have made the "G" look more like a "2" it would make a lot more sense.
Posted by filmmaker45
Member since Mar 2008
14554 posts
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:33 pm to
These guys have no clue what they're doing.
Posted by bradwieser
Cornell Fan
Member since May 2008
10555 posts
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

I could understand the "G" in Big looking like a "0" if they had changed the name of the conference. But when your name is still the Big 10, why is there a need to pay homage to the old name? As said before if they could have made the "G" look more like a "2" it would make a lot more sense.


word
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96060 posts
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I could understand the "G" in Big looking like a "0" if they had changed the name of the conference. But when your name is still the Big 10, why is there a need to pay homage to the old name? As said before if they could have made the "G" look more like a "2" it would make a lot more sense.


no doubt
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram