- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Big 10 Divisions: Legends and Leaders
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:31 pm to BLIZZAKE7
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:31 pm to BLIZZAKE7
I could understand the "G" in Big looking like a "0" if they had changed the name of the conference. But when your name is still the Big 10, why is there a need to pay homage to the old name? As said before if they could have made the "G" look more like a "2" it would make a lot more sense.
3
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:33 pm to etm512
These guys have no clue what they're doing.
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:35 pm to etm512
quote:
I could understand the "G" in Big looking like a "0" if they had changed the name of the conference. But when your name is still the Big 10, why is there a need to pay homage to the old name? As said before if they could have made the "G" look more like a "2" it would make a lot more sense.
word
Posted on 12/13/10 at 12:56 pm to etm512
quote:
I could understand the "G" in Big looking like a "0" if they had changed the name of the conference. But when your name is still the Big 10, why is there a need to pay homage to the old name? As said before if they could have made the "G" look more like a "2" it would make a lot more sense.
no doubt
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News