Started By
Message

re: I'm thinking if Mett chooses LSU, Crowton stays

Posted on 12/4/10 at 9:16 pm to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43956 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Crowton will stay, because of what he can do with a true pocket passer (that has had the opportunity to develop with time). (See Matt Flynn)


Crowton had absolutely nothing to do with Matt Flynn's development. Crowton has shown time and time again that he doesn't know how to develop a QB.

Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52878 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 9:18 pm to



Crowton had Flynn for one year.
Posted by alange
Island hoppin
Member since Feb 2009
4820 posts
Posted on 12/4/10 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Crowton had absolutely nothing to do with Matt Flynn's development. Crowton has shown time and time again that he doesn't know how to develop a QB.

Right, he hasn't, but Mett doesn't exactly need much development, just like Flynn didn't when he won a Natty. Mett is already capable of managing a game and winning it, and has the upside to really make our O "O"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram