Yeah, because if you were in charge of LSU football, we'd be sitting in Tiger stadium 6 games a year watching blowouts against arse-suck teams with but two games worth watching.

Wow, what a bunch of fun.

quote:
In the words of Herm Edwards...

Who gives a frick what Herm Edwards has to say? Do you let other people dictate to you how you should enjoy LSU football?

quote:
So, if it's a blowout, you'll say we shouldn't have scheduled it?

No, I'll say we have to get better.

What a pussy you are.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by medtiger

Member since Sep 2003

21682 posts

Posted on 11/25/10 at 1:54 pm to WildTchoupitoulas

quote:
Yeah, because if you were in charge of LSU football, we'd be sitting in Tiger stadium 6 games a year watching blowouts against arse-suck teams with but two games worth watching.

No, we'd be watching 4 SEC games, 1 game against a BCS conference opponent, and 2 games against the ULM's, ULL's, La Tech's of the world, just like we usually do. That's the perfect way to schedule in today's college football world.

quote:
Who gives a frick what Herm Edwards has to say?

Dude, the point was just to quote someone else. Herm Edwards doesn't have anything to do with this. To use this in your argument in this thread is really stupid.

quote:
Do you let other people dictate to you how you should enjoy LSU football?

Not at all, where did I even suggest that I do?

quote:
What a pussy you are.

No, I'm just smarter than you. We don't have to play Oregon to win a National Championship. Sure, it'll be fun to watch that game. If we win, it will do wonders for LSU's ranking, just like when we beat Va Tech in 2007. But we don't need that game next year to boost our schedule strength. We already have an OOC game against a quality opponent. Play this game in 2012, and I have no problem with it, except that I think it should be home and home instead of neutral site. This wasn't a smart idea, and I'm not the only one with a brain who thinks this way.

Happy Thanksgiving