- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC is irrelevent to the BCSCG after Auburn loses
Posted on 10/31/10 at 1:30 am to lsutigermall
Posted on 10/31/10 at 1:30 am to lsutigermall
quote:
That's ridiculous. Winner of SEC-CG goes to BCS-CG (even with 2 losses). Everyone remembers Florida vs Hawaii - not going to try that again real soon.
I have to respectfully disagree with you. The winner of the SECCG in years past has been able vault a one loss SEC team to the top of the standings because it has been such a quality win. If Auburn falls to Alabama, it could mean the end of the SEC's ability to play in the BCS championship game this year because of the opponent that will represent the East in the SECCG. We need to hope that South Carolina keeps winning so they will be in the top 10 for the SECCG. If the team that is representing the East isnt in the top 10 it will be very hard for a 1 loss Alabama, Auburn, or possibly LSU to pass up Boise St, or TCU to play for the BCSNC.
This post was edited on 10/31/10 at 1:37 am
Posted on 10/31/10 at 1:35 am to shaunk128
LSU in 03 did not get a bump because of UGA. If I remember correct the same team can't be counted twice or some such shite.
Regardless the SECCG doesn't have as big an effect as you think. If it did OU would fell further also in 03.
Big misconception.
Regardless the SECCG doesn't have as big an effect as you think. If it did OU would fell further also in 03.
Big misconception.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News