Started By
Message

re: SEC is irrelevent to the BCSCG after Auburn loses

Posted on 10/31/10 at 1:30 am to
Posted by shaunk128
Houma
Member since Jan 2008
82 posts
Posted on 10/31/10 at 1:30 am to
quote:

That's ridiculous. Winner of SEC-CG goes to BCS-CG (even with 2 losses). Everyone remembers Florida vs Hawaii - not going to try that again real soon.


I have to respectfully disagree with you. The winner of the SECCG in years past has been able vault a one loss SEC team to the top of the standings because it has been such a quality win. If Auburn falls to Alabama, it could mean the end of the SEC's ability to play in the BCS championship game this year because of the opponent that will represent the East in the SECCG. We need to hope that South Carolina keeps winning so they will be in the top 10 for the SECCG. If the team that is representing the East isnt in the top 10 it will be very hard for a 1 loss Alabama, Auburn, or possibly LSU to pass up Boise St, or TCU to play for the BCSNC.
This post was edited on 10/31/10 at 1:37 am
Posted by pitbull20
Somewhere close... real close
Member since Oct 2003
7762 posts
Posted on 10/31/10 at 1:35 am to
LSU in 03 did not get a bump because of UGA. If I remember correct the same team can't be counted twice or some such shite.

Regardless the SECCG doesn't have as big an effect as you think. If it did OU would fell further also in 03.

Big misconception.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram