re: I salute you TenTex-You nailed it

quote:

---

i don't think he runs a 4.5

---

I wrote "ish". If he's not there, he's close. And "you don't think" doesn't mean much.

quote:

---

we replaced monty with adams or mingo, who are both faster

---

maybe, maybe not, but Montgomery was the starter at his spot, where Mingo/Adams usually share time at the other DE spot. So this doesn't prove anything. We were missing a key starter at DE. They were missing a running back. It's a wash.

quote:

---

and demps is too fast for that. it's LB/S responsibility

---

As I said before, containment is one of the DEs responsibility. Monty frequently chases runners down the sideline and prevents them from getting the edge. That he would likely require LB/S support w/Demps doesn't change anything.

You haven't refuted anything effectively. The point still stands. Saying their best player was out is not a good excuse when we were missing a good player, too.

quote:

---

The bottom line is simply an outcome

---

quote:

---

by your definition

---

Yup. Mine and most other people.

quote:

---

The summary or result

---

bottom line

You don't know and can't prove what Demps would've done. So, you should stop trying to defend this point.


...and from your post to another poster

quote:

---

it is what it is. an expected win

---

We were expected to lose to Florida by almost everyone, including the talking heads and Vegas. It was absolutely in no way an expected win. McNeese is an expected win.

C'mon, I give you credit for being smarter than these posts. Stop arguing for the sake of arguing. There are plenty of legit things to criticize and you're missing those opportunities by trying to defend your position in these clearly wrong opinions... your stubbornness is starting to remind me of Miles' stubbornness in keeping JJ in game. tsk.